Skip to main content

Incredibles 2 Review


It's been a while since audiences last saw the Parr family, fourteen years to be exact. However, if it wasn't for the updated animation, you'd hardly notice in their latest outing. Incredibles 2 picks up directly where its predecessor left off, almost instantly thrusting the audience into a blistering action sequence to rival any live-action blockbuster. The zippy nature of animation lends itself to sensational superhero fights and the quick-witted dialogue further enlivens the pace, resulting in some of the year's most thrilling set pieces.

The aforementioned updated animation means Incredibles 2 is visually gorgeous. There's some particularly striking use of colour and lighting to create frames that look straight out of a comic book. The original’s stylish designs are carried over, but they've been freshened up to look slicker than ever. All the new characters have fantastic designs too, each glowing with colour and personality. Especially impressive is the genuinely eerie look of the Screenslaver, the film's spindly, hypnotist villain who dons a fantastically freaky, Doctor Who-esque gas mask.

Much like the original, Incredibles 2 is held together by a brilliant script. The writing is always razor sharp and frequently hilarious, often poking fun at family relationships to provoke big laughs. As is always the case, there's slapstick humour for younger audiences and smarter material for the older ones. Pixar are seasoned professionals at this point, so they nail the balance between the two and make sure the simpler stuff is still entertainingly executed for everyone. The script also fleshes out each character very effectively, giving all of them robust character arcs that are explored from intriguing angles.

The return of the Incredibles couldn't be better timed, either. In the midst of this now decade-long superhero saturation, Pixar's idiosyncratic take on the genre is more than welcome. Much of the subversion comes in the form of the Screenslaver who - not unlike Heath Ledger's Joker from The Dark Knight - questions the nature of superheroes in undeniably compelling ways. This time, the superhero satire has also been paired with a progressive look at gender roles. The infrequently represented working mum/stay-at-home dad dynamic is portrayed here with thoughtful depth and understanding, as well as some delightful humour.

Due to its very nature as a sequel, it's hard to say how Incredibles 2 stacks up to its predecessor. The follow-up to such a unique film will inherently be less fresh and exciting. However, taken on its own merits, Incredibles 2 is a spectacular film. Beautifully animated, skilfully written and with a timely message to boot, you can definitely say the sequel to Incredibles is incredible... too.

8.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...