Skip to main content

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review


Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World, the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes.

Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom. I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an excellent director, responsible for 2016’s fantastic A Monster Calls. Additionally, trailers suggested the franchise was finally headed in the intriguing direction The Lost World dipped into. Also, Jeff Goldblum was back!

So, were my hopes met? Did all my Jurassic dreams come true? Well, sort of. There are a number of risks the film takes that I appreciate, even if their success varies. The film's structure is intriguing, for example. The first act whizzes through the typical Jurassic Park plot points before everything is subverted and we're taken in a decidedly different direction. The dinosaurs are brought to the real world, like the second film's climax but on a more claustrophobic scale. The Lost World brought a T-Rex to a city, Fallen Kingdom confines numerous dinosaurs in a mansion, concentrating the danger and heightening the tension.

J.A. Bayona also utilities his experience directing horror films to spruce up Fallen Kingdom's aesthetic. Bayona brings out the gothic eeriness in the film's setting, especially amplifying it during a dinosaur auction scene run by the slimy human antagonists. It's here that the film attempts some social commentary, analysing animal exploitation by the greedy and warmongering, as well as society's attitudes towards conservation. It's a valiant effort but the film too quickly decides what side of the debate its on. When it does bring in opposing views it ends up confused rather than nuanced.

Unfortunately, when the film's risks fall flat it means we waste time that could be spent on scary dino-action. Consequently, despite the potentially thrilling set up, there aren't many genuinely nail-biting moments. This is also because we don't care about the characters. Just like its predecessor, none of them are in any way engaging. There's little to no attempt at development and there aren't any particularly charming personalities. Even Chris Pratt is utterly dull, acting as if he's nearly exceeded his charisma quota for the month. Worse still, Jeff Goldblum is barely in the film!

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom shouldn't even exist, but that doesn't mean it can't be good. There is a lot of potential here and enough of it is met for me to enjoy myself. However, not every risk pays off and the character problems of the previous film are all too present this time as well. Still, the attempts to change up the franchise are a step in the right direction and the ending does set up a potentially unique third instalment. Who knows, maybe life will finally find a way to another great film?

6.8/10

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hail, Caesar! Review - Genius Behind the Madness

On an entirely surface level, Hail, Caesar! is a really silly film. The sets are bright and colourful, the characters are bombastic and larger than life and the plot is completely insane and all over the place. If you take a closer look, however, it's much more intelligent than it initially comes off as. Yes, the sets are bright, but their attention to detail is so fantastically minute, you're totally convinced that this is the 50's. The fake film sets are also just as convincing and the films themselves could easily pass off as authentic, if it wasn't for the 21st Century actors populating them. They are obviously slightly exaggerated, for the sake of satire, which probably resonates more with those familiar with retro cinema than regular filmgoers. It's also shot brilliantly by cinematographer Roger Deakins (who was recently Oscar nominated for his work on Sicario ), who manages to make the film feel like something that's not only set in the 50's, bu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Avengers: Age of Ultron Any Good?

Avengers Assemble! Again! Avengers: Age of Ultron - Film Review by Nathan Brooks And they say English Weather's bad. Back in the summer of 2012, a little film came out called Avengers Assemble. It wasn't much. It's only the biggest superhero film of all time and it only made $1.518 billion. Everybody loved it, I loved it and clearly moviegoers did as well.  Due to its massive success, obviously a sequel was going to be made. In this case, that sequel is Avengers: Age of Ultron, but with all the hype it's received, is it actually any good? Story The story in this film is definitely not for first time Marvel viewers, you really need to see most, if not all, of the previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films. It is packed full of references to earlier films and understanding a lot of elements of the story will require you to have seen the others. But is the story any good? I thinks so. The main story centres around the fact that Tony Stark, or Iron Man, has ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...
Post a Comment
Read more