Skip to main content

Is Night At The Museum: Secret of the Tomb Any Good?

One Last Night
Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb - A quick film review by Nathan Brooks

What you find with many film series at the moment is that, overtime, they get considerably worse. Night at the Museum is one of very few series that has managed to keep it's consistent quality, although admittedly it's never been an oscar contender to begin with. Ultimately, the Night at the Museum films have always been good for one thing; a fun time. Your life will not be changed, but you will find yourself leaving the cinema room smiling a little. But does the third one continue this tradition, or is it much worse (or better) than the previous two?

What I Liked
Going in, my expectations were pretty low. I'd recently seen another third film in a family comedy series and it was absolutely awful and at that time it was the worst film of 2014 (that was before I'd seen TMNT). Any guesses? Yep, it was Nativity 3. Oh dear. Fortunately, Night at the Museum 3 is just as good as the previous two. 

M. C. Esher's Relativity
Night At The Museum's
Relativity
I was surprised to find that the majority of the jokes were actually quite funny, with only a few duff ones (I'll get to that later). All the performances were pretty good, especially Dan Stevens as Lancelot, playing a sort of Buzz Lightyear like character who thinks he's real, despite the fact he obviously isn't. There were also some particularly standout moments, including an excellent fight scene in M. C. Escher's lithograph Relativity, making full use of the optical illusion aspect of it, as well as a brilliant scene with Hugh Jackman and Alice Eve.

There's also a scene were Robin Williams's character, a waxwork of Theodore Roosevelt, saying goodbye to Ben Stiller's character, which due to the events of the real world, is a very sad moment, although admittedly not really something you can congratulate the film on. However, the ending scenes were still quite well done and wrapped up the series in the best way possible.

The strengths of the Night at the Museum films have always been the fun aspect and fortunately I found myself laughing a lot more than my expectations suggested I would.

What I Disliked
It's very hard to dislike this film, to be honest. I should probably rename it as 'What Wasn't Particularly Good But Didn't Bother Me That Much Anyway'. 

What Wasn't Particularly Good But Didn't Bother Me That Much Anyway

The plot was admittedly quite weak. The point of their quest is to stop the tablet that brings the waxworks to life from decaying and stopping everyone from dying as a result of it. There's not much else to say about it really and pretty much only one thing in the plot changes from that one description. 

The character 'development' between Ben Stiller's character and his son was also very cliché and not particularly interesting. There were also a few duff jokes that were clearly aimed at younger kids, as well as some other jokes directly taken from the first film, but as I've said it's very difficult to let these things bother you in a film like Night at the Museum.

What I Think
Unless you're super grumpy and love to take apart a film piece by piece complaining about every tiny little detail about it, you should be able to at least smile at this film. It is not going to win any awards, it's not going to change anybodies' lives, but it might make you chuckle a bit. Or a lot, if you're like me.


Overall: 7/10

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...
Post a Comment
Read more