Skip to main content

Is Portal Any Good?

The Cake is a Lie
Portal - A Very Late Video Game Review by Nathan Brooks

Most people my age don't really care for PC gaming. Every argument is "Which is better, XBox One or PS4?" (imagine I said that in a really dumb voice). Usually I complain about how much they neglect Nintendo, who are and probably forever will be my favourite video game company. However, PC gaming also deserves more recognition that it's getting from my age group, especially for Valve. Valve are basically the leading PC game producing company and they're pretty good at it as well. They're most well known for their Half-Life series of games, which I've never played, but have heard are very good. They're also very well know for the Portal series of video games. After recently completing the two games, I decided I wanted to do a two-part mini series on them. So here's part one.

Story
If you stripped this story down to it's bare bones you can barely even call it a story. It's very basic. However, we don't get just the bare bones, we get the meat, and it's some pretty great meat.

The story is played out entirely by one person; GlaDOS, an AI that runs a test facility, called Aperture Science, in which you are a test subject. She speaks to you as you make it through different test chambers and the best thing about her is that every comment she makes is filled with sarcasm. This makes the story, despite being extremely simple, very funny.

Obviously, as I've said before, it's pretty basic but very entertaining nonetheless. 
7.5/10


Gameplay
Original games are hard to come by these days, almost everything is either a First Person Shooter or a First Person Shooter. What I'm trying to say is everything is just a flipping First Person Shooter nowadays. Even Portal is kind of an FPS, but not in the usual sense.

Now your thinking with portals.
You do have a gun, but it's a Portal Gun. It doesn't shoot bullets, it shoots portals and you need to use these portals to complete puzzles, not kill people. You can shoot to different coloured portals, a blue and an orange one, and if you go through a blue one, you come out of an orange one and vice versa.

On its own, this gameplay design is very clever, but combined with the level design, it's just genius. Every single level and every single mechanic is designed by some of the cleverest people on Earth. It has just the right difficulty, so that nothing's too easy, but nothing feels like a chore to solve. Plus, once you do solve a puzzle, it's very satisfying.

When you're not laughing at GlaDOS's lines you'll probably find yourselves congratulating the game designers at Valve for just being so unbelievably clever.
10/10

Presentation
The graphics in this game aren't very shiny, I mean it did come out in 2007. However the game is successful in creating a very eerie atmosphere. The design is very simple and empty, which goes in this game's favour as that's exactly how it wants you to feel. It's a weird game, therefore it's supposed to make you feel unsettled. It doesn't have the fanciest graphics on the planet, but it does use what it has to full effect. And you know what they say, less is more. 

Speaking of less is more, there are two pieces of music in this game. Two. However, that's the point. If there was music the entire time, it would ruin the atmosphere entirely. It's an empty, minimalistic and scary atmosphere that's made even better by having almost no music. When there is music, however, it's still great. One of the two pieces of music is a song played in the end credits called 'Still Alive'. It's sung by GlaDOS, so as you'd expect, it's hilarious. Weird, obviously, but extremely funny.

So the graphics aren't amazing and there's barely any music, but Portal still manages to use that in a positive way, and that's pretty clever.
9/10

Lasting Appeal
This game is really short. You could complete it in about 2-3 hours. Obviously there are some challenge maps, as well as some developer commentary and achievements to unlock, so it's not all bad. It is still very short.
6.5/10

Overall
I like weird, but I only like clever weird. Thankfully, Portal is clever weird. The gameplay is ingenious, the story is funny, but a little empty and the atmosphere is really unsettling. The only problem I have with Portal is the fact that it's really short. But there's always Portal 2.

"Hello, and again, welcome to the Aperture Science
computer-aided research enrichment centre."
Overall: 8.2/10

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Doctor Who: The Tsuranga Conundrum Review

We are now halfway through the series and showrunner Chris Chibnall has been involved in writing every episode so far. This is quite unusual. Even in their first series as showrunners, Russell T Davies and Steven Moffat weren't responsible for the entire first half (in both cases, Mark Gatiss wrote the episode the showrunners didn't). Of course, Rosa was co-written by Malorie Blackman, and I suspect Chibnall was the lesser involved of the two given the episode's themes. However, Chibnall has controlled the start of this series very carefully. This makes sense, considering how different Chibnall's vision for Doctor Who is from his predecessors. It's important that he establishes this new, character-driven focus so that viewers can get used to it and other writers can build on it. That said, it's also nice to have contributions from different writers and The Tsuranga Conundrum indicates that it's about time that happens. The Tsuranga Conundrum is proba...
Post a Comment
Read more