Skip to main content

Zootropolis Review - Beautiful Animation, Important Message


Since Disney's animation renaissance, that started back in 2010 with Tangled, everything they've been putting out has been consistently very good, from the Oscar winning Big Hero 6 to the box office smashing Frozen. None of them, however, have been as good as Zootropolis.

Obviously, Zootropolis delivers on the essentials. The animation is as beautiful as you'd expect from a studio like Disney in 2016 and the character and location design is some of the best I've ever seen. I thought that the city of San Fransokyo in Big Hero 6 was stunning, but Zootroplis is on another level. There's huge attention to detail throughout, with design choices as small as trains having different sized doors for different sized animals, or big as the city being split into multiple different environments. The level of creativity on display here is on par with some of Pixar's greatest work.

Everything else is just as high quality as the animation. The script is incredibly fast and witty, supplying a lot of consistent laughs, from slapstick jokes for younger audiences and more clever gags for the older ones. The story is easy to follow, but it twists and turns enough to consistently hold your attention, considering its unusually long (for a kids movie) 108 minute running time. The characters are just as compelling as the plot, and while the film never quite meets the emotional heights of something like Inside Out, the challenges and struggles the main characters face are very modern and relatable.

‘Modern’ is a very good word to describe Zootropolis, because its message is a surprisingly contemporary one. It may seem, on the surface, just like another bright and colourful kids film, but it's actually a lot more clever than that. The main topic of the film is discrimination, something that's very relevant at the moment and it's handled very well. Instead of taking sides in real life situations (which would inevitably lead to a lot of problems), the film uses animals that don't represent any specific group, allowing the film to avoid unnecessary controversy, whilst not sacrificing the effect or the importance of the message. Kind of like Animal Farm, especially the 1954 adaptation, which was also (for some reason) a kids film.

To me, it’s the message that puts Zootropolis above any of the other recent Disney animations. It shows a level of maturity and an awareness of the real world that no other animated film has ever shown, whilst still staying colourful, enjoyable and funny. As I said before, you may not cry as much as you would in some of Pixar's best, but you'll come out of the cinema with a lot more to talk about than you'd expect.

8.4/10

Comments

  1. Great review, feel I'd like to see it with my grandkids now! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...