Skip to main content

Monsters Review - These Aren't the Monsters You're Looking For


Monsters, director Gareth Edwards’ feature film debut, is one of those movies I'm glad I never saw the trailer for until after I'd actually watched it. The trailer, at least to me, gets the film very wrong. It sells it as this tense, action packed Hollywood thriller, filled with scary aliens and noble humans trying to save the planet. It’s clearly trying to pander to mainstream audiences by making the film seem like this, but in reality it's the complete opposite.

Monsters isn't a consistently fast paced, shiny thriller. It's a very slow moving, gritty, but beautiful film. It has its tense moments, but those aren't what you'll spend the majority of time in. Most of the time you'll be revelling in the amazing atmosphere of the film. It’s sometimes exciting, sometimes sombre, sometimes disturbing, but always alive. Every part of Monsters feels totally real and there's a good reason for that. It's because most of it is. Almost all of the dialogue is improvised by the two stunning leads, Scoot McNairy and Whitney Able and the rest of the cast is made up entirely of random people the crew literally pulled of the street. The performances given by the extras don't just feel genuine, they are genuine and it immerses you into the world in a way that very few other films have managed to achieve.

Monsters also looks gorgeous. Gareth Edwards not only directs, but shoots the entire film too and his beautiful handheld cinematography adds to the sense of realism. It's right there in the action, with the leads, with all the extras and helps to immerse the audience even more. All of the breathtaking locations are shot perfectly, capturing all of the visual awesomeness as well as the wonderful atmosphere they provide. According to Edwards, the number one rule was ‘if it looks good, shoot it’ and, even though it meant two hours of raw footage for the editors to sit through every day, it was totally worth it for the fantastic end product. Edwards also provided the visual effects and, considering the $500,000 budget, they're astonishing. The so-called ‘monsters’ have amazing, attention grabbing screen presence and they're designed in such a way that they can come off as both scary and beautiful.

The monsters are arguably the most fascinating part of this film. The chemistry and relationship between the main characters is captivating, mainly thanks to the fact that McNairy and Able are a real couple, but it's the aliens, the extraterrestrials, that deliver the film’s message, which, despite the fact that Monsters is 6 years old, is still very relevant. You assume that the monsters in this film are the aliens at the beginning and that's what it wants you to believe, but as it goes on, you discover that they aren't the real monsters. We are. The humans are the ones responsible for stirring up the aliens and for driving them to violence, by attacking the aliens and by bombing them. Sound familiar? It draws instant parallels to a lot of things in the real world, like immigration and especially the war on terror. It explores the idea that the real terrorists, the real monsters, are the one’s trying to fight fire with fire, because all they're achieving is encouraging the violence. It's all allegorical, never directly referencing terrorism or any specific real life issues, instead doing something that is more creative and impressive artistically, as well as something that provides an unbiased picture that doesn't take any real life sides. There’s also a wall in between Mexico and the USA.

The best thing about Monsters is how well it handles this message. The filmmakers never feel the need to force it down your throat. It's never said in a line of dialogue, or spelled out for you through a forced monologue, but is instead implied by the different tones and events that take place throughout the film. The aesthetic of each side gradually changes during the film, with the humans coming off as friendly at first and the aliens coming off as terrifying, until the humans begin to appear much rougher and unwelcoming and the aliens appear more beautiful and compelling. Monsters respects its audience's intelligence by delivering an important, thought provoking message without it getting in the way of the film. Instead, the message is the film.

I feel like a lot of the reviews got Monsters very wrong. They said things like it's “action packed” and “absolutely thrilling”, when it really isn't. I know that sounds a bit snobbish for some random teenager to claim a professional film critic doesn't understand a film, but those quotes were from the Daily Mirror and my 6 year old cousin has more journalistic integrity than they do. Monsters is not any of the things the reviews or the trailers make it out to be; it's much better than that. It's beautiful, it's raw, it's intelligent, it's impressive, it's thought provoking, it's original. It's genius.

9.1/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Molly's Game Review

Up until this point, Aaron Sorkin has exclusively been a writer. Responsible for creating iconic TV shows such as  The West Wing and The Newsroom , as well as recently penning the screenplays for  The Social Network and  Steve Jobs , Sorkin's dense, witty and rapid-fire style is successful with critics and audiences alike. However, Molly's Game marks Sorkin's first time in the director's chair. Unlike The Social Network and Steve Jobs , where Sorkin's writing was filtered through directors David Fincher and Danny Boyle respectively, this is purely his vision . Is it any good, or is it just an indulgent attempt to cram as many words into 140 minutes as possible? There is no doubt that Molly's Game is an Aaron Sorkin film. Dialogue is the centre of attention and for good reason: it's excellent. Of course, it isn't exactly naturalistic. Every line sounds like one that you come up with an hour after a conversation and wish you'd said instead. Howe...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...

Is Super 8 Any Good?

Super Gr8 Super 8 - A Late Film Review by Nathan Brooks Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of a train exploding. A little while back, Disney bought Star Wars off of George Lucas. Shortly afterwards, they announced they were going to make not one, not two, not three, not four, not fi- oh no wait, it is five. Five new Star Wars films, the first of which, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is being directed by J.J. Abrams. The real question, however, is whether Abrams will do a good job of it or not. Well, this is the film that makes me confident he will. Story On it's own the story isn't extremely amazing, it's just about a bunch of kids discovering a government conspiracy, although it is still interesting. It doesn't reveal too much, meaning you're kept in the dark throughout the majority of the film, so you're always wanting to find out what happens next. The thing is though, that's sort of a sub plot. The main part of the story is th...