Skip to main content

A Collection of Films I Forgot to Review (2016)


Deadpool

Everybody seemed to adore this film when it was released, but I can't say it excited me that much. I enjoy meta humour as much as the next man, but Deadpool’s is never as clever as it thinks it is. The majority of the time it just consists of Ryan Reynolds acknowledging to the camera that something was “cliché” and then doing nothing particularly funny with it. Still, Reynolds is good, the action is grittier than your usual superhero blockbuster, and it doesn't end with a giant space beam shooting into the sky. 6.6/10

Sing Street

Absolutely wonderful from start to finish. The sharp dialogue combined with the gleefully ridiculous song numbers kept me laughing throughout. The acting is very strong, Jack Reynor delivering a particular compelling performance as the protagonist’s older brother. By the third act the tone shifts, becoming more poignant and less humorous. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, it’s just a noticeable change that does allow the film to end on a thoughtful and emotional note. 8.7/10
 
The BFG

An adequately pleasant film. Mark Rylance is fantastic as the titular character, and the CGI is superb and surprisingly hefty. Ruby Barnhill nails the defiant nature of Sophie, even if she does verge on annoying sometimes. The main issue, however, is the rather meandering pace and general lack of plot. Still, that's more an issue with the source material, which Steven Spielberg manages to adapt with as much magic and whimsy as you'd hope. 7.4/10

Jason Bourne

It's essentially another Bourne film, but there's enough difference for it to not feel entirely unnecessary. Matt Damon delivers a brilliant physical performance, showcasing a Bourne that's more aged and world weary since his last outing. The plot itself adds some modern twists, tackling the ethicality of surveillance in a similar vein to Spectre. Admittedly, I don't need another one anytime soon, but it’s still the best action you’ll see on film this year. 7.8/10

Doctor Strange

A unique departure from the usual MCU outing. Benedict Cumberbatch delivers a delightfully dry and sarcastic performance as the titular character, whilst Tilda Swinton adds an unusual amount of personality to the typically boring and pretentious teacher character. The plot is more narrowly focused than Civil War, though it is on a smaller and less significant scale. The action and visuals are spectacularly trippy and the third act is by far Marvel's most inventive. Plus, whilst I wish the rest of the score was as psychedelic as the credits theme, the soundtrack does include my favourite Pink Floyd song. 8.2/10

Arrival

A refreshingly smart sci-fi film that relies on a fascinating narrative and compelling characters over flashy visual effects and soulless spectacle. Amy Adams and Jeremy Renner play interesting leads, and the plot - whilst slower than blockbuster audiences are used to - asks important, relevant questions that challenge the current political climate without feeling preachy. There's also a fantastic twist that would make M. Night Shyamalan go weak at the knees. 8.6/10

I, Daniel Blake

Undoubtedly the most stirring film I’ve ever seen. Ken Loach’s filmmaking is grittily naturalistic, perfectly capturing the lives of those neglected by the current welfare state. Meanwhile, Dave Johns and Hayley Squires give a face to those people in two outstanding and empathetic performances. The best part of the film, however, is that it doesn’t just rile up anger, but celebrates the power of basic humanity and the importance of unity. It’s a passionate film with a significant impact. 8.4/10

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

About on par with the more average Potter films, like Goblet of Fire and Half-Blood Prince. Eddie Redmayne is perfectly cast, playing Newt Scamander with lovable awkwardness. Ezra Miller's performance is also pretty unsettling, and the film isn't afraid to explore some impressively dark themes. Sadly, the plot isn't as tight as I'd want it to be, with slightly too many things going on at once, making it difficult to stay fully invested when you keep going back and forth. Still, it's a better start to a franchise than The Philosopher's Stone. 7.5/10

Passengers

It’s not as intelligent as Arrival, but it’s still decently entertaining. There appears to be one plot point that’s ruined the film for a lot of people, but I don’t really agree. The main issue with the film is it plays everything too safe; the ending is especially contrived and, as a result, the film’s ideas are never explored in as much depth as they deserve. On the other hand, Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence are as good as you’d expect, although I’m pretty sure I’m going to get bored of them soon. 6.6/10

Rogue One review coming soon, as well as the top 10 some point at the end of the year/start of next year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...