Skip to main content

La La Land Review - A Baffling Disappointment


I don't dislike La La Land solely because it's popular. It's not really its fault so many people love it. Plus, I unashamedly love Star Wars and you don't get much more popular than that. Still, in the case of La La Land, it irritates me. In my opinion, Star Wars deserves to be that popular. La La Land does not.

Alright, La La Land isn't terrible. For one, the cinematography is beyond gorgeous. Colours burst vibrantly out of every frame and the camera extravagantly sweeps the viewer through Los Angeles. Meanwhile, Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone are likeable leads, providing a relatively accessible point for the audience to enter. Pretty much everything else about La La Land is... fine. The screenplay is good, with witty and authentic dialogue. The songs are also good, with enough fun and bouncy numbers balanced with slower, mellower ones. None of it's that impressive, though. It's done well, but it's no masterpiece.

Also, La La Land never seems to have a clear intent. It's been advertised as this revival of classic musicals and its dynamic, highly saturated cinematography supports this. Yet everything else is too mundane. Whilst pleasant, the song numbers are dreadfully forgettable and the choreography is pathetically unimaginative. Plus, whilst it's nice the characters are more down to earth, Stone and Gosling frankly aren't great singers. Some elements pop out like they're supposed to, but most just sit back, content with being functional.

For me, the nail in La La Land's coffin is its ending [SPOILERS IF YOU SOMEHOW HAVEN'T SEEN THIS FILM YET]. The main leads don't stay together. That's not inherently a problem, challenging conventions is usually a good thing. Except it doesn't make any sense in the context of the film. If the whole thing had been a subversion of the genre, I'd have no problem, but isn't this supposed to be a revival of classic musicals? The rest of the film follows the tropes it's supposed to, yet all of a sudden it rejects this one.

What's worse is how it ruins the lead character's arcs. There wasn't anything in the way of their relationship. In fact, it looked like they were about to resolve their conflicts. Then, the film jumps a few years and Mia is married to some random bloke we've never met and never get to know. It's such a bizarre choice that screeches their character progressions to an inexplicable halt. The audience is left completely unsatisfied. Not in a clever way, like Inception, but a completely unnecessary way that serves no narrative purpose. The film doesn't really explain itself either, expecting you to accept that this is what happened to the characters without ever exploring it in any detail.

So, La La Land is a decent film with a rubbish ending. I would be pretty content with saying that, giving the film a middling review and just moving on. Except I was sold a masterpiece. Why? It has a couple of redeeming qualities, but for the most part, it's weirdly uninspired. Admittedly, I am not a musical person, so maybe I'm not the film's audience. Still, I can't imagine how musical fans will find much in La La Land that hasn't already been done better. At least it didn't win Best Picture in the end.

6.7/10

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Super 8 Any Good?

Super Gr8 Super 8 - A Late Film Review by Nathan Brooks Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of a train exploding. A little while back, Disney bought Star Wars off of George Lucas. Shortly afterwards, they announced they were going to make not one, not two, not three, not four, not fi- oh no wait, it is five. Five new Star Wars films, the first of which, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is being directed by J.J. Abrams. The real question, however, is whether Abrams will do a good job of it or not. Well, this is the film that makes me confident he will. Story On it's own the story isn't extremely amazing, it's just about a bunch of kids discovering a government conspiracy, although it is still interesting. It doesn't reveal too much, meaning you're kept in the dark throughout the majority of the film, so you're always wanting to find out what happens next. The thing is though, that's sort of a sub plot. The main part of the story is th...
Post a Comment
Read more

More Catching Up to Do

Considering how bad I am at regularly updating this blog under typical circumstances, it's hardly surprising I missed a ton of reviews during my GCSE period. Fortunately, that's now over. Unfortunately, I still don't have the time/can't be bothered to keep up with new releases whilst writing full reviews for every film I missed. So, instead, I'm going to use the same cop-out as last year and squeeze several capsule reviews into one post. Coco I never saw  The Good Dinosaur because - by all accounts - it was pretty mediocre, but I did see Cars 3 and it was... pretty mediocre. Coco , on the other hand, is not. Whilst maybe not the crème de la crème of Pixar films, Coco is still high up there. It does what Pixar does best: blending vivid, whimsical magic with thoughtful, mature themes, appealing to young and old audiences alike. This time, Pixar tackle mortality, loss and grief with beautiful animation and a rich appreciation of Mexican culture. There's also ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Star Wars: A New Hope Review - A Better Film From A More Practical Age

The most difficult part of writing this review was deciding whether or not to refer to this film as Star Wars or A New Hope . Being born a long time after the film came out, I've always known it as a A New Ho pe, but I'm obviously aware that to a lot of people it is Star Wars and no amount of special editions will change that. I still haven't found an answer to that question and I have literally no idea where I'm going with this, so I think I'll just shut up and get on with the review. A Tangible Galaxy, Far Far Away If you watch A New Hope after watching the prequels (which I did last time I watched it) the first thing you notice is how real everything feels. The super revolutionary reason for that is because it is real. In the '70s there was no CGI, or at least not in a way that would be able to sustain an entire film, so instead the filmmakers actually built the sets. I know, what a ridiculous idea? Against all the odds, however, A New Hope looks abs...
Post a Comment
Read more