Skip to main content

La La Land Review - A Baffling Disappointment


I don't dislike La La Land solely because it's popular. It's not really its fault so many people love it. Plus, I unashamedly love Star Wars and you don't get much more popular than that. Still, in the case of La La Land, it irritates me. In my opinion, Star Wars deserves to be that popular. La La Land does not.

Alright, La La Land isn't terrible. For one, the cinematography is beyond gorgeous. Colours burst vibrantly out of every frame and the camera extravagantly sweeps the viewer through Los Angeles. Meanwhile, Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone are likeable leads, providing a relatively accessible point for the audience to enter. Pretty much everything else about La La Land is... fine. The screenplay is good, with witty and authentic dialogue. The songs are also good, with enough fun and bouncy numbers balanced with slower, mellower ones. None of it's that impressive, though. It's done well, but it's no masterpiece.

Also, La La Land never seems to have a clear intent. It's been advertised as this revival of classic musicals and its dynamic, highly saturated cinematography supports this. Yet everything else is too mundane. Whilst pleasant, the song numbers are dreadfully forgettable and the choreography is pathetically unimaginative. Plus, whilst it's nice the characters are more down to earth, Stone and Gosling frankly aren't great singers. Some elements pop out like they're supposed to, but most just sit back, content with being functional.

For me, the nail in La La Land's coffin is its ending [SPOILERS IF YOU SOMEHOW HAVEN'T SEEN THIS FILM YET]. The main leads don't stay together. That's not inherently a problem, challenging conventions is usually a good thing. Except it doesn't make any sense in the context of the film. If the whole thing had been a subversion of the genre, I'd have no problem, but isn't this supposed to be a revival of classic musicals? The rest of the film follows the tropes it's supposed to, yet all of a sudden it rejects this one.

What's worse is how it ruins the lead character's arcs. There wasn't anything in the way of their relationship. In fact, it looked like they were about to resolve their conflicts. Then, the film jumps a few years and Mia is married to some random bloke we've never met and never get to know. It's such a bizarre choice that screeches their character progressions to an inexplicable halt. The audience is left completely unsatisfied. Not in a clever way, like Inception, but a completely unnecessary way that serves no narrative purpose. The film doesn't really explain itself either, expecting you to accept that this is what happened to the characters without ever exploring it in any detail.

So, La La Land is a decent film with a rubbish ending. I would be pretty content with saying that, giving the film a middling review and just moving on. Except I was sold a masterpiece. Why? It has a couple of redeeming qualities, but for the most part, it's weirdly uninspired. Admittedly, I am not a musical person, so maybe I'm not the film's audience. Still, I can't imagine how musical fans will find much in La La Land that hasn't already been done better. At least it didn't win Best Picture in the end.

6.7/10

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hail, Caesar! Review - Genius Behind the Madness

On an entirely surface level, Hail, Caesar! is a really silly film. The sets are bright and colourful, the characters are bombastic and larger than life and the plot is completely insane and all over the place. If you take a closer look, however, it's much more intelligent than it initially comes off as. Yes, the sets are bright, but their attention to detail is so fantastically minute, you're totally convinced that this is the 50's. The fake film sets are also just as convincing and the films themselves could easily pass off as authentic, if it wasn't for the 21st Century actors populating them. They are obviously slightly exaggerated, for the sake of satire, which probably resonates more with those familiar with retro cinema than regular filmgoers. It's also shot brilliantly by cinematographer Roger Deakins (who was recently Oscar nominated for his work on Sicario ), who manages to make the film feel like something that's not only set in the 50's, bu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Avengers: Age of Ultron Any Good?

Avengers Assemble! Again! Avengers: Age of Ultron - Film Review by Nathan Brooks And they say English Weather's bad. Back in the summer of 2012, a little film came out called Avengers Assemble. It wasn't much. It's only the biggest superhero film of all time and it only made $1.518 billion. Everybody loved it, I loved it and clearly moviegoers did as well.  Due to its massive success, obviously a sequel was going to be made. In this case, that sequel is Avengers: Age of Ultron, but with all the hype it's received, is it actually any good? Story The story in this film is definitely not for first time Marvel viewers, you really need to see most, if not all, of the previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films. It is packed full of references to earlier films and understanding a lot of elements of the story will require you to have seen the others. But is the story any good? I thinks so. The main story centres around the fact that Tony Stark, or Iron Man, has ...
Post a Comment
Read more