Skip to main content

La La Land Review - A Baffling Disappointment


I don't dislike La La Land solely because it's popular. It's not really its fault so many people love it. Plus, I unashamedly love Star Wars and you don't get much more popular than that. Still, in the case of La La Land, it irritates me. In my opinion, Star Wars deserves to be that popular. La La Land does not.

Alright, La La Land isn't terrible. For one, the cinematography is beyond gorgeous. Colours burst vibrantly out of every frame and the camera extravagantly sweeps the viewer through Los Angeles. Meanwhile, Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone are likeable leads, providing a relatively accessible point for the audience to enter. Pretty much everything else about La La Land is... fine. The screenplay is good, with witty and authentic dialogue. The songs are also good, with enough fun and bouncy numbers balanced with slower, mellower ones. None of it's that impressive, though. It's done well, but it's no masterpiece.

Also, La La Land never seems to have a clear intent. It's been advertised as this revival of classic musicals and its dynamic, highly saturated cinematography supports this. Yet everything else is too mundane. Whilst pleasant, the song numbers are dreadfully forgettable and the choreography is pathetically unimaginative. Plus, whilst it's nice the characters are more down to earth, Stone and Gosling frankly aren't great singers. Some elements pop out like they're supposed to, but most just sit back, content with being functional.

For me, the nail in La La Land's coffin is its ending [SPOILERS IF YOU SOMEHOW HAVEN'T SEEN THIS FILM YET]. The main leads don't stay together. That's not inherently a problem, challenging conventions is usually a good thing. Except it doesn't make any sense in the context of the film. If the whole thing had been a subversion of the genre, I'd have no problem, but isn't this supposed to be a revival of classic musicals? The rest of the film follows the tropes it's supposed to, yet all of a sudden it rejects this one.

What's worse is how it ruins the lead character's arcs. There wasn't anything in the way of their relationship. In fact, it looked like they were about to resolve their conflicts. Then, the film jumps a few years and Mia is married to some random bloke we've never met and never get to know. It's such a bizarre choice that screeches their character progressions to an inexplicable halt. The audience is left completely unsatisfied. Not in a clever way, like Inception, but a completely unnecessary way that serves no narrative purpose. The film doesn't really explain itself either, expecting you to accept that this is what happened to the characters without ever exploring it in any detail.

So, La La Land is a decent film with a rubbish ending. I would be pretty content with saying that, giving the film a middling review and just moving on. Except I was sold a masterpiece. Why? It has a couple of redeeming qualities, but for the most part, it's weirdly uninspired. Admittedly, I am not a musical person, so maybe I'm not the film's audience. Still, I can't imagine how musical fans will find much in La La Land that hasn't already been done better. At least it didn't win Best Picture in the end.

6.7/10

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...
Post a Comment
Read more