Skip to main content

Blade Runner 2049 Review - Worth the Hype


The original Blade Runner was released in 1982 to a rather tepid reception. Despite being directed by Ridley Scott off the back of his 1979 sci-fi/horror classic Alien and starring Harrison Ford of Star Wars and Indiana Jones fame, the chilling tech-noir based on Phillip K. Dick’s novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was a critical and commercial disappointment.
However, since its theatrical release, Blade Runner has had a multitude of recuts that eventually fulfilled Scott’s original vision and raised its status from middling flop to cult masterpiece. Of course, Hollywood smelt Blade Runner's popularity and naturally responded with a sequel. Bizarrely, unlike many sequels to beloved classics, Blade Runner 2049 isn’t just a cynical cash grab - it’s actually good.

In fact, it’s absolutely spellbinding. Denis Villeneuve, director of 2015’s slick thriller Sicario and 2016’s fascinating sci-fi mind-bender Arrival helms Blade Runner 2049. Reducing Ridley Scott‘s role to executive producer was an astute decision, preventing the film from suffering the same fate as the now struggling Alien franchise and allowing Villeneuve to carve a fresh identity for the sequel. However, he wisely maintains many of the original’s best qualities. Thanks to Joe Walker’s purposeful editing, the original's gradual pace is still present, allowing the audience to really immerse themselves in the film’s atmosphere.

And what an atmosphere that is. Cinematography mastermind Roger Deakins shoots mesmerizing dystopian landscapes - ranging from cluttered, neon cities to crumbling, barren wastelands - with surreal flair. Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch’s brutally industrial and aggressively distorted score is intensely overwhelming. This haunting future is then brought to life through the cast's pitch-perfect performances. Ryan Gosling brings an engaging complexity to the lead role, Sylvia Hoeks is a ruthless antagonist and Jared Leto puts his infamously weird style to good use (more than making up for Suicide Squad).

Original writer Hampton Fancher returns to pen the screenplay. Fancher and co-writer Michael Green craft a gripping neo-noir plot that shrewdly plays with the audience’s expectations, subverts worn-out tropes and poses vast existential questions. There’s also a constant emotional potency channelled authentically by the cast and satisfied deftly by the narrative. In particular, Harrison Ford reprises his role of Rick Deckard in an older, wearier guise that respectfully continues and deeply enriches his character arc.

In other words, Blade Runner 2049 is an unexpected triumph that lives up to the original whilst standing on its own as a breath-taking cinematic achievement.

9.7/10


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Horrible Christmas Rant

Horrible, Horrible Christmas, In Every Single Sense of the Word Horrible Christmas - A Quick Rant by Nathan Brooks The Good When you expect one thing, and get something else, you can get very angry. You can get so angry that you refuse to acknowledge the positives of what you have got, and just focus on what you haven't got. For example, Agents of SHIELD. I think Agents of SHIELD is great, but unfortunately I don't appear to share that opinion with a lot of other people. Why? Because they're too busy whining about the lack of all the superhero-y stuff they expected and fair enough, considering you are watching a Marvel TV show. However, I've managed to let that initial disappointment go, and I've found I really enjoy this show.  The Bad Horrible Christmas, a Horrible Histories stage production, is the complete opposite of this. As the theme of this post suggests, I expected something great. Horrible Histories is the only children's educatio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Avengers: Age of Ultron Any Good?

Avengers Assemble! Again! Avengers: Age of Ultron - Film Review by Nathan Brooks And they say English Weather's bad. Back in the summer of 2012, a little film came out called Avengers Assemble. It wasn't much. It's only the biggest superhero film of all time and it only made $1.518 billion. Everybody loved it, I loved it and clearly moviegoers did as well.  Due to its massive success, obviously a sequel was going to be made. In this case, that sequel is Avengers: Age of Ultron, but with all the hype it's received, is it actually any good? Story The story in this film is definitely not for first time Marvel viewers, you really need to see most, if not all, of the previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films. It is packed full of references to earlier films and understanding a lot of elements of the story will require you to have seen the others. But is the story any good? I thinks so. The main story centres around the fact that Tony Stark, or Iron Man, has ...
Post a Comment
Read more