Skip to main content

Blade Runner 2049 Review - Worth the Hype


The original Blade Runner was released in 1982 to a rather tepid reception. Despite being directed by Ridley Scott off the back of his 1979 sci-fi/horror classic Alien and starring Harrison Ford of Star Wars and Indiana Jones fame, the chilling tech-noir based on Phillip K. Dick’s novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was a critical and commercial disappointment.
However, since its theatrical release, Blade Runner has had a multitude of recuts that eventually fulfilled Scott’s original vision and raised its status from middling flop to cult masterpiece. Of course, Hollywood smelt Blade Runner's popularity and naturally responded with a sequel. Bizarrely, unlike many sequels to beloved classics, Blade Runner 2049 isn’t just a cynical cash grab - it’s actually good.

In fact, it’s absolutely spellbinding. Denis Villeneuve, director of 2015’s slick thriller Sicario and 2016’s fascinating sci-fi mind-bender Arrival helms Blade Runner 2049. Reducing Ridley Scott‘s role to executive producer was an astute decision, preventing the film from suffering the same fate as the now struggling Alien franchise and allowing Villeneuve to carve a fresh identity for the sequel. However, he wisely maintains many of the original’s best qualities. Thanks to Joe Walker’s purposeful editing, the original's gradual pace is still present, allowing the audience to really immerse themselves in the film’s atmosphere.

And what an atmosphere that is. Cinematography mastermind Roger Deakins shoots mesmerizing dystopian landscapes - ranging from cluttered, neon cities to crumbling, barren wastelands - with surreal flair. Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch’s brutally industrial and aggressively distorted score is intensely overwhelming. This haunting future is then brought to life through the cast's pitch-perfect performances. Ryan Gosling brings an engaging complexity to the lead role, Sylvia Hoeks is a ruthless antagonist and Jared Leto puts his infamously weird style to good use (more than making up for Suicide Squad).

Original writer Hampton Fancher returns to pen the screenplay. Fancher and co-writer Michael Green craft a gripping neo-noir plot that shrewdly plays with the audience’s expectations, subverts worn-out tropes and poses vast existential questions. There’s also a constant emotional potency channelled authentically by the cast and satisfied deftly by the narrative. In particular, Harrison Ford reprises his role of Rick Deckard in an older, wearier guise that respectfully continues and deeply enriches his character arc.

In other words, Blade Runner 2049 is an unexpected triumph that lives up to the original whilst standing on its own as a breath-taking cinematic achievement.

9.7/10


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...