Skip to main content

Molly's Game Review


Up until this point, Aaron Sorkin has exclusively been a writer. Responsible for creating iconic TV shows such as The West Wing and The Newsroom, as well as recently penning the screenplays for The Social Network and Steve Jobs, Sorkin's dense, witty and rapid-fire style is successful with critics and audiences alike. However, Molly's Game marks Sorkin's first time in the director's chair. Unlike The Social Network and Steve Jobs, where Sorkin's writing was filtered through directors David Fincher and Danny Boyle respectively, this is purely his vision. Is it any good, or is it just an indulgent attempt to cram as many words into 140 minutes as possible?

There is no doubt that Molly's Game is an Aaron Sorkin film. Dialogue is the centre of attention and for good reason: it's excellent. Of course, it isn't exactly naturalistic. Every line sounds like one that you come up with an hour after a conversation and wish you'd said instead. However, what it lacks in realism it more than makes up for in entertainment. Those familiar with any of Sorkin's other works will be well acquainted with the dialogue's breakneck pace and razor-sharp nature. Sorkin's talent for guiding the audience through jargon-heavy conversation is also present and a myriad of smart setups and payoffs (particularly one involving Arthur Miller's The Crucible) allow for clever comedy and thoughtful character development. Being the seasoned professional that he is, I expected nothing less from Sorkin, but in Molly's Game, his writing is still as exhilarating as ever.

What's most interesting about Molly's Game is seeing what Aaron Sorkin's directing is like. For the most part, it's exactly like his writing: fast. The dazzling cinematography, snappy editing and blistering line delivery come together to form a supersonic cinematic experience. Of course, it's easy to see all of this as merely superficial fluff. In particular, the narrated sections that periodically interrupt the main plot to explore Molly's backstory move at such high speed it's difficult for any actual humanity to come through. However, I always interpreted these sequences as Sorkin's equivalent to an action scene. Not necessarily packed with character or plot development, but an undoubtedly entertaining increase of pace. Crucially, as well, Sorkin does know when to slow down to properly flesh out his characters. A scene near the end involving Molly and her father hits a number of powerful emotional notes and does so at a respectable pace that allows those emotions to sink in.

Another key element that ensures Molly's Game isn't just a glorified radio play are the performances. It's all too easy to deliver Sorkin's dialogue like a robot and - as much as I like Jesse Eisenberg - his performance as Mark Zuckerberg in The Social Network didn't entirely avoid this trap. Fortunately, Jessica Chastain never comes close to making the same mistake. Whilst still speaking as quickly as humanly possible, Chastain is always authentic and emotive. Her incredible performance truly holds Molly's Game together, conveying a protagonist that - unlike Zuckerberg or Steve Jobs - the audience can empathise with. The supporting actors also add a lot to the film. Idris Elba plays Molly's lawyer with wit and passion and Kevin Costner confidently underlines the complexity of Molly's father. Beyond the flashy filmmaking, Molly's Game may be Sorkin's most sincere film yet.

I'll admit I am a bit of a Sorkin fanboy. Everything about his style works spectacularly well for me and Molly's Game is clearly the purest distillation of it yet. If you aren't fond of his previous works, you're just going to find this film tedious at best. Maybe one day a film will reach peak Sorkin and even I will have to admit he's gone too far. Molly's Game, however, is not that film. It's a whirlwind of dexterous dialogue, dynamic directing and potent performances that never failed to keep me gripped to the screen.

8.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hail, Caesar! Review - Genius Behind the Madness

On an entirely surface level, Hail, Caesar! is a really silly film. The sets are bright and colourful, the characters are bombastic and larger than life and the plot is completely insane and all over the place. If you take a closer look, however, it's much more intelligent than it initially comes off as. Yes, the sets are bright, but their attention to detail is so fantastically minute, you're totally convinced that this is the 50's. The fake film sets are also just as convincing and the films themselves could easily pass off as authentic, if it wasn't for the 21st Century actors populating them. They are obviously slightly exaggerated, for the sake of satire, which probably resonates more with those familiar with retro cinema than regular filmgoers. It's also shot brilliantly by cinematographer Roger Deakins (who was recently Oscar nominated for his work on Sicario ), who manages to make the film feel like something that's not only set in the 50's, bu...

Is Avengers: Age of Ultron Any Good?

Avengers Assemble! Again! Avengers: Age of Ultron - Film Review by Nathan Brooks And they say English Weather's bad. Back in the summer of 2012, a little film came out called Avengers Assemble. It wasn't much. It's only the biggest superhero film of all time and it only made $1.518 billion. Everybody loved it, I loved it and clearly moviegoers did as well.  Due to its massive success, obviously a sequel was going to be made. In this case, that sequel is Avengers: Age of Ultron, but with all the hype it's received, is it actually any good? Story The story in this film is definitely not for first time Marvel viewers, you really need to see most, if not all, of the previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films. It is packed full of references to earlier films and understanding a lot of elements of the story will require you to have seen the others. But is the story any good? I thinks so. The main story centres around the fact that Tony Stark, or Iron Man, has ...

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...