Skip to main content

Molly's Game Review


Up until this point, Aaron Sorkin has exclusively been a writer. Responsible for creating iconic TV shows such as The West Wing and The Newsroom, as well as recently penning the screenplays for The Social Network and Steve Jobs, Sorkin's dense, witty and rapid-fire style is successful with critics and audiences alike. However, Molly's Game marks Sorkin's first time in the director's chair. Unlike The Social Network and Steve Jobs, where Sorkin's writing was filtered through directors David Fincher and Danny Boyle respectively, this is purely his vision. Is it any good, or is it just an indulgent attempt to cram as many words into 140 minutes as possible?

There is no doubt that Molly's Game is an Aaron Sorkin film. Dialogue is the centre of attention and for good reason: it's excellent. Of course, it isn't exactly naturalistic. Every line sounds like one that you come up with an hour after a conversation and wish you'd said instead. However, what it lacks in realism it more than makes up for in entertainment. Those familiar with any of Sorkin's other works will be well acquainted with the dialogue's breakneck pace and razor-sharp nature. Sorkin's talent for guiding the audience through jargon-heavy conversation is also present and a myriad of smart setups and payoffs (particularly one involving Arthur Miller's The Crucible) allow for clever comedy and thoughtful character development. Being the seasoned professional that he is, I expected nothing less from Sorkin, but in Molly's Game, his writing is still as exhilarating as ever.

What's most interesting about Molly's Game is seeing what Aaron Sorkin's directing is like. For the most part, it's exactly like his writing: fast. The dazzling cinematography, snappy editing and blistering line delivery come together to form a supersonic cinematic experience. Of course, it's easy to see all of this as merely superficial fluff. In particular, the narrated sections that periodically interrupt the main plot to explore Molly's backstory move at such high speed it's difficult for any actual humanity to come through. However, I always interpreted these sequences as Sorkin's equivalent to an action scene. Not necessarily packed with character or plot development, but an undoubtedly entertaining increase of pace. Crucially, as well, Sorkin does know when to slow down to properly flesh out his characters. A scene near the end involving Molly and her father hits a number of powerful emotional notes and does so at a respectable pace that allows those emotions to sink in.

Another key element that ensures Molly's Game isn't just a glorified radio play are the performances. It's all too easy to deliver Sorkin's dialogue like a robot and - as much as I like Jesse Eisenberg - his performance as Mark Zuckerberg in The Social Network didn't entirely avoid this trap. Fortunately, Jessica Chastain never comes close to making the same mistake. Whilst still speaking as quickly as humanly possible, Chastain is always authentic and emotive. Her incredible performance truly holds Molly's Game together, conveying a protagonist that - unlike Zuckerberg or Steve Jobs - the audience can empathise with. The supporting actors also add a lot to the film. Idris Elba plays Molly's lawyer with wit and passion and Kevin Costner confidently underlines the complexity of Molly's father. Beyond the flashy filmmaking, Molly's Game may be Sorkin's most sincere film yet.

I'll admit I am a bit of a Sorkin fanboy. Everything about his style works spectacularly well for me and Molly's Game is clearly the purest distillation of it yet. If you aren't fond of his previous works, you're just going to find this film tedious at best. Maybe one day a film will reach peak Sorkin and even I will have to admit he's gone too far. Molly's Game, however, is not that film. It's a whirlwind of dexterous dialogue, dynamic directing and potent performances that never failed to keep me gripped to the screen.

8.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...