Skip to main content

Molly's Game Review


Up until this point, Aaron Sorkin has exclusively been a writer. Responsible for creating iconic TV shows such as The West Wing and The Newsroom, as well as recently penning the screenplays for The Social Network and Steve Jobs, Sorkin's dense, witty and rapid-fire style is successful with critics and audiences alike. However, Molly's Game marks Sorkin's first time in the director's chair. Unlike The Social Network and Steve Jobs, where Sorkin's writing was filtered through directors David Fincher and Danny Boyle respectively, this is purely his vision. Is it any good, or is it just an indulgent attempt to cram as many words into 140 minutes as possible?

There is no doubt that Molly's Game is an Aaron Sorkin film. Dialogue is the centre of attention and for good reason: it's excellent. Of course, it isn't exactly naturalistic. Every line sounds like one that you come up with an hour after a conversation and wish you'd said instead. However, what it lacks in realism it more than makes up for in entertainment. Those familiar with any of Sorkin's other works will be well acquainted with the dialogue's breakneck pace and razor-sharp nature. Sorkin's talent for guiding the audience through jargon-heavy conversation is also present and a myriad of smart setups and payoffs (particularly one involving Arthur Miller's The Crucible) allow for clever comedy and thoughtful character development. Being the seasoned professional that he is, I expected nothing less from Sorkin, but in Molly's Game, his writing is still as exhilarating as ever.

What's most interesting about Molly's Game is seeing what Aaron Sorkin's directing is like. For the most part, it's exactly like his writing: fast. The dazzling cinematography, snappy editing and blistering line delivery come together to form a supersonic cinematic experience. Of course, it's easy to see all of this as merely superficial fluff. In particular, the narrated sections that periodically interrupt the main plot to explore Molly's backstory move at such high speed it's difficult for any actual humanity to come through. However, I always interpreted these sequences as Sorkin's equivalent to an action scene. Not necessarily packed with character or plot development, but an undoubtedly entertaining increase of pace. Crucially, as well, Sorkin does know when to slow down to properly flesh out his characters. A scene near the end involving Molly and her father hits a number of powerful emotional notes and does so at a respectable pace that allows those emotions to sink in.

Another key element that ensures Molly's Game isn't just a glorified radio play are the performances. It's all too easy to deliver Sorkin's dialogue like a robot and - as much as I like Jesse Eisenberg - his performance as Mark Zuckerberg in The Social Network didn't entirely avoid this trap. Fortunately, Jessica Chastain never comes close to making the same mistake. Whilst still speaking as quickly as humanly possible, Chastain is always authentic and emotive. Her incredible performance truly holds Molly's Game together, conveying a protagonist that - unlike Zuckerberg or Steve Jobs - the audience can empathise with. The supporting actors also add a lot to the film. Idris Elba plays Molly's lawyer with wit and passion and Kevin Costner confidently underlines the complexity of Molly's father. Beyond the flashy filmmaking, Molly's Game may be Sorkin's most sincere film yet.

I'll admit I am a bit of a Sorkin fanboy. Everything about his style works spectacularly well for me and Molly's Game is clearly the purest distillation of it yet. If you aren't fond of his previous works, you're just going to find this film tedious at best. Maybe one day a film will reach peak Sorkin and even I will have to admit he's gone too far. Molly's Game, however, is not that film. It's a whirlwind of dexterous dialogue, dynamic directing and potent performances that never failed to keep me gripped to the screen.

8.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...

Doctor Who: The Tsuranga Conundrum Review

We are now halfway through the series and showrunner Chris Chibnall has been involved in writing every episode so far. This is quite unusual. Even in their first series as showrunners, Russell T Davies and Steven Moffat weren't responsible for the entire first half (in both cases, Mark Gatiss wrote the episode the showrunners didn't). Of course, Rosa was co-written by Malorie Blackman, and I suspect Chibnall was the lesser involved of the two given the episode's themes. However, Chibnall has controlled the start of this series very carefully. This makes sense, considering how different Chibnall's vision for Doctor Who is from his predecessors. It's important that he establishes this new, character-driven focus so that viewers can get used to it and other writers can build on it. That said, it's also nice to have contributions from different writers and The Tsuranga Conundrum indicates that it's about time that happens. The Tsuranga Conundrum is proba...

Hail, Caesar! Review - Genius Behind the Madness

On an entirely surface level, Hail, Caesar! is a really silly film. The sets are bright and colourful, the characters are bombastic and larger than life and the plot is completely insane and all over the place. If you take a closer look, however, it's much more intelligent than it initially comes off as. Yes, the sets are bright, but their attention to detail is so fantastically minute, you're totally convinced that this is the 50's. The fake film sets are also just as convincing and the films themselves could easily pass off as authentic, if it wasn't for the 21st Century actors populating them. They are obviously slightly exaggerated, for the sake of satire, which probably resonates more with those familiar with retro cinema than regular filmgoers. It's also shot brilliantly by cinematographer Roger Deakins (who was recently Oscar nominated for his work on Sicario ), who manages to make the film feel like something that's not only set in the 50's, bu...