Skip to main content

Avengers: Infinity War Review


Hollywood is obsessed with cinematic universes. Nowadays, it seems that every blockbuster franchise is on a mission to sprawl into as many films (and consequently as many wallets) as possible. However, while more recent attempts such as DC’s Extended Universe and Universal’s Dark Universe continue to stumble over rushed worldbuilding and poor reviews, the pioneering Marvel Cinematic Universe keeps going from strength to strength. After smashing glass ceilings with the slick, smart and sincere Black Panther earlier this year, the MCU smashed box office records with Avengers: Infinity War. The third and penultimate instalment in the MCU’s central series, Infinity War beat 2015’s Star Wars: The Force Awakens to earn the biggest opening weekend ever.

However - as impressive as this is - box office numbers mean nothing if the film isn’t any good and I wasn’t confident Infinity War was going to succeed in that area. As exciting as the trailers were, I couldn’t see how all these characters were going to fit into one film. 2015’s Avengers: Age of Ultron suffocated under its massive cast list, which now looks amusingly weedy next to Infinity War’s mammoth hero roster. How would any of these characters make a lasting impression? How could they deliver all the inevitable exposition without compromising characterisation? Frankly, I was convinced it wasn’t going to work. Except - somehow - it absolutely did.

Directors Anthony and Joe Russo alongside writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely have pulled off a remarkably ambitious feat with staggering skill. The filmmakers take full advantage of Infinity War’s position as the nineteenth instalment in the MCU. Audiences who have been keeping up are closely familiar with these characters now, so the film doesn’t waste time reintroducing them. This will naturally disorientate new audiences, but by this point they really should know what they’re getting in to. More importantly, the filmmakers craft the plot around the characters. Heroes are intently put together to spark explosive (and often hilarious) interactions and the circumstances thrown at them are precisely designed to challenge their characters to considerable extents.

Running throughout all this is a commendably thoughtful exploration of how we value life. Characters are constantly forced into situations where they have to consider sacrificing individuals for the greater good. The Russo brothers direct these scenes with genuine emotive power and the huge list of top-tier actors deliver with all the aplomb you’d expect. This central theme is distilled perfectly into the antagonist Thanos. The best villains are driven by clear, understandable motives and Thanos is a prime example of this. He represents the extreme conclusion to sacrificing for the greater good and his case is regularly argued convincingly, even if he is ultimately wrong. Thanos is also driven by sincere feelings that the film doesn’t minimise and he even faces similar emotional dilemmas to the protagonists. If anything, Thanos is Infinity War’s main character.

Of course, the film isn’t perfect. As previously mentioned, newcomers will struggle to engage without watching eighteen other films in preparation. Additionally, not all characters are given as much screen time. Captain America and Black Widow, for example, aren’t explored in nearly as much depth as others. However, most of these flaws are excusable in the grand scheme of things. Infinity War is the first of two parts and is consequently only half the story. Markus and McFeely have already assured us that they intentionally overlooked certain characters because their roles become considerably more interesting in part two. Some will argue that films have to first and foremost work by themselves, but I would argue that only applies to traditional filmmaking. The cinematic universe format is an entirely unconventional one and it needs to be treated as such.

So, I could not have been more wrong about Infinity War. What I thought was going to fall apart under the weight of its cast, ambition and hype ended up flourishing well above my expectations. Well done Marvel, you have successfully astounded me and I eagerly anticipate what part two has to offer.

8.7/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...

Doctor Who: The Tsuranga Conundrum Review

We are now halfway through the series and showrunner Chris Chibnall has been involved in writing every episode so far. This is quite unusual. Even in their first series as showrunners, Russell T Davies and Steven Moffat weren't responsible for the entire first half (in both cases, Mark Gatiss wrote the episode the showrunners didn't). Of course, Rosa was co-written by Malorie Blackman, and I suspect Chibnall was the lesser involved of the two given the episode's themes. However, Chibnall has controlled the start of this series very carefully. This makes sense, considering how different Chibnall's vision for Doctor Who is from his predecessors. It's important that he establishes this new, character-driven focus so that viewers can get used to it and other writers can build on it. That said, it's also nice to have contributions from different writers and The Tsuranga Conundrum indicates that it's about time that happens. The Tsuranga Conundrum is proba...

Hail, Caesar! Review - Genius Behind the Madness

On an entirely surface level, Hail, Caesar! is a really silly film. The sets are bright and colourful, the characters are bombastic and larger than life and the plot is completely insane and all over the place. If you take a closer look, however, it's much more intelligent than it initially comes off as. Yes, the sets are bright, but their attention to detail is so fantastically minute, you're totally convinced that this is the 50's. The fake film sets are also just as convincing and the films themselves could easily pass off as authentic, if it wasn't for the 21st Century actors populating them. They are obviously slightly exaggerated, for the sake of satire, which probably resonates more with those familiar with retro cinema than regular filmgoers. It's also shot brilliantly by cinematographer Roger Deakins (who was recently Oscar nominated for his work on Sicario ), who manages to make the film feel like something that's not only set in the 50's, bu...