Skip to main content

Avengers: Infinity War Review


Hollywood is obsessed with cinematic universes. Nowadays, it seems that every blockbuster franchise is on a mission to sprawl into as many films (and consequently as many wallets) as possible. However, while more recent attempts such as DC’s Extended Universe and Universal’s Dark Universe continue to stumble over rushed worldbuilding and poor reviews, the pioneering Marvel Cinematic Universe keeps going from strength to strength. After smashing glass ceilings with the slick, smart and sincere Black Panther earlier this year, the MCU smashed box office records with Avengers: Infinity War. The third and penultimate instalment in the MCU’s central series, Infinity War beat 2015’s Star Wars: The Force Awakens to earn the biggest opening weekend ever.

However - as impressive as this is - box office numbers mean nothing if the film isn’t any good and I wasn’t confident Infinity War was going to succeed in that area. As exciting as the trailers were, I couldn’t see how all these characters were going to fit into one film. 2015’s Avengers: Age of Ultron suffocated under its massive cast list, which now looks amusingly weedy next to Infinity War’s mammoth hero roster. How would any of these characters make a lasting impression? How could they deliver all the inevitable exposition without compromising characterisation? Frankly, I was convinced it wasn’t going to work. Except - somehow - it absolutely did.

Directors Anthony and Joe Russo alongside writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely have pulled off a remarkably ambitious feat with staggering skill. The filmmakers take full advantage of Infinity War’s position as the nineteenth instalment in the MCU. Audiences who have been keeping up are closely familiar with these characters now, so the film doesn’t waste time reintroducing them. This will naturally disorientate new audiences, but by this point they really should know what they’re getting in to. More importantly, the filmmakers craft the plot around the characters. Heroes are intently put together to spark explosive (and often hilarious) interactions and the circumstances thrown at them are precisely designed to challenge their characters to considerable extents.

Running throughout all this is a commendably thoughtful exploration of how we value life. Characters are constantly forced into situations where they have to consider sacrificing individuals for the greater good. The Russo brothers direct these scenes with genuine emotive power and the huge list of top-tier actors deliver with all the aplomb you’d expect. This central theme is distilled perfectly into the antagonist Thanos. The best villains are driven by clear, understandable motives and Thanos is a prime example of this. He represents the extreme conclusion to sacrificing for the greater good and his case is regularly argued convincingly, even if he is ultimately wrong. Thanos is also driven by sincere feelings that the film doesn’t minimise and he even faces similar emotional dilemmas to the protagonists. If anything, Thanos is Infinity War’s main character.

Of course, the film isn’t perfect. As previously mentioned, newcomers will struggle to engage without watching eighteen other films in preparation. Additionally, not all characters are given as much screen time. Captain America and Black Widow, for example, aren’t explored in nearly as much depth as others. However, most of these flaws are excusable in the grand scheme of things. Infinity War is the first of two parts and is consequently only half the story. Markus and McFeely have already assured us that they intentionally overlooked certain characters because their roles become considerably more interesting in part two. Some will argue that films have to first and foremost work by themselves, but I would argue that only applies to traditional filmmaking. The cinematic universe format is an entirely unconventional one and it needs to be treated as such.

So, I could not have been more wrong about Infinity War. What I thought was going to fall apart under the weight of its cast, ambition and hype ended up flourishing well above my expectations. Well done Marvel, you have successfully astounded me and I eagerly anticipate what part two has to offer.

8.7/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

Hail, Caesar! Review - Genius Behind the Madness

On an entirely surface level, Hail, Caesar! is a really silly film. The sets are bright and colourful, the characters are bombastic and larger than life and the plot is completely insane and all over the place. If you take a closer look, however, it's much more intelligent than it initially comes off as. Yes, the sets are bright, but their attention to detail is so fantastically minute, you're totally convinced that this is the 50's. The fake film sets are also just as convincing and the films themselves could easily pass off as authentic, if it wasn't for the 21st Century actors populating them. They are obviously slightly exaggerated, for the sake of satire, which probably resonates more with those familiar with retro cinema than regular filmgoers. It's also shot brilliantly by cinematographer Roger Deakins (who was recently Oscar nominated for his work on Sicario ), who manages to make the film feel like something that's not only set in the 50's, bu...

Is Avengers: Age of Ultron Any Good?

Avengers Assemble! Again! Avengers: Age of Ultron - Film Review by Nathan Brooks And they say English Weather's bad. Back in the summer of 2012, a little film came out called Avengers Assemble. It wasn't much. It's only the biggest superhero film of all time and it only made $1.518 billion. Everybody loved it, I loved it and clearly moviegoers did as well.  Due to its massive success, obviously a sequel was going to be made. In this case, that sequel is Avengers: Age of Ultron, but with all the hype it's received, is it actually any good? Story The story in this film is definitely not for first time Marvel viewers, you really need to see most, if not all, of the previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films. It is packed full of references to earlier films and understanding a lot of elements of the story will require you to have seen the others. But is the story any good? I thinks so. The main story centres around the fact that Tony Stark, or Iron Man, has ...