There's no reason Solo should exist. Few fans were clamouring for it - certainly not as much as an Obi-Wan spin-off - and recasting the character when he's been defined by Harrison Ford for so long seemed too big a risk. Regardless, it exists now. I'm not here to judge a film on its necessity but its qualities as a film. So, whether we wanted it or not, is Solo any good?
Solo is a lot of fun, even if it isn't much else. If you're expecting more of the dramatic heft of The Last Jedi, you'll be disappointed. If anything, Solo is the Star Wars sequel that's closest in essence to A New Hope; a scrappy group of likeable (rather than complex) characters zipping around space and having adventures. Without the extra save-the-galaxy layer A New Hope has, everything in Solo does feel relatively inconsequential. However, a more small-scale Star Wars film is quite refreshing. Plus, ignoring the bigger picture allows the film to explore the weirder, seedier corners of the galaxy. In particular, the brilliantly gross Lady Proxima and the disarmingly menacing Dryden Vos provide a fascinating insight into the Star Wars criminal underworld.
Solo's production was also infamously turbulent, with Ron Howard replacing original directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller for extensive reshoots. Fortunately - as is to be expected from a reliable professional such as Howard - the film comes together almost seamlessly. The first act occasionally feels a little rushed, but Solo soon finds a strong rhythm that deftly balances exhilarating action with focused character moments. As has been the case for all the Disney Star Wars films, Solo also looks impeccable. Top-notch special effects bring wonderfully creative creature designs to life and Arrival cinematographer Bradford Young's use of colour and lighting is rather striking (even if the poor projection that cripples most cinemas these days doesn't do it justice).
Of course, the most controversial part of Solo is the casting of Alden Ehrenreich as the titular character. It doesn't help that replacing Harrison Ford is inherently controversial, but Ehrenreich received extra backlash as many had their hearts set on Ford impersonator Anthony Ingruber. The thing is, Ehrenreich is seriously fantastic. He isn't playing Harrison Ford, he's playing Han Solo and he absolutely nails the cocky exterior/sincere interior combination that makes Han such an iconic character. In fact, there are great performances all round, from Woody Harrelson's sympathetically world-weary Tobias Beckett to Donald Glover's effortlessly cool Lando Calrissian. However, it's Paul Bettany's scene-stealing turn as the volatile villain Dryden Vos that stands out the most, despite his limited screen time.
Solo's biggest weakness is its script. Despite being co-written by veteran Star Wars scribe Lawrence Kasdan, the dialogue is very reflective of the film's overall lack of depth. The abundance of one-liners usually serves the film's light tone just fine and provides a solid handful of laughs. However, the more serious moments often topple into cheesiness as the script attempts to condense complex ideas into the snappy quips that populate the rest of the film. However, Solo doesn't always get it wrong. In particular, the third act is filled with smart subversions and compelling twists, ending the film at its most gripping.
We didn't need Solo, but I think we're better off with it than without it. I've seen it twice now and I've thoroughly enjoyed it both times. Despite its lack of depth and flawed script, Solo delivers an action-packed ride bolstered by confident performances and the typical visual wonder that makes Star Wars such an enduring franchise.
7.7/10
Comments
Post a Comment