Skip to main content

Bad Times at the El Royale Review


It would have been very easy for Bad Times at the El Royale to be mere popcorn entertainment. Certainly based on the trailers, it looked like an enjoyable but shallow film that treated its characters flippantly in favour of quips and guns. Its slick appearance and lavish cast were enough to entice me to the cinema, but I was still hoping the film itself would aim higher. Given writer/director Drew Goddard's historical tendency to make films more than they first appear, I was optimistic. Fortunately, that attitude wasn't misplaced. 

Bad Times at the El Royale is intricately constructed. Visually, there's so much attention to detail, with set design comparable to Wes Anderson's incredible The Grand Budapest Hotel. Although, replacing the hotel with a motel gives it a sordid edge that distinguishes this film from Anderson's. Seamus McGarvey's cinematography indulgently soaks in this atmosphere, framing each shot with purpose and drenching it with intoxicating neon. Scenes are blocked and choreographed in somewhat theatrical but undeniably mesmerising ways. Michael Giacchino's sinister score juxtaposed against the soulful soundtrack creates an unnerving, contradictory aural landscape that perfectly reflects the action on-screen. The narrative itself is just as intriguing, opting for a structure that isn't entirely linear. The plot is dexterously shuffled around itself by distinct chapters that jump back and forth through time and occasionally overlap.

However, Bad Times at the El Royale works as well as it does because it's more than just style. There's a surprising amount of depth to the themes and characters that injects the surface thrills with substance. Beneath the sinuous structure and dense dialogue, Goddard's script is a layered discussion of morality. Right and wrong are ingeniously symbolised by the two sides of the bi-state hotel, with the morally ambiguous antagonist shown literally walking the line between them. In fact, the time Goddard dedicates to fleshing out the characters is when this theme is explored most thoroughly. Each character is carrying a troubled, immoral past that is forced out of them by the unfolding events. Through dialogue, flashbacks and occasional violence, Goddard delves into how these burdens have shaped the characters, whether that's crippling them with guilt or driving them away from morality altogether. The film’s search for redemption takes it to intensely dark places, never settling on a simple conclusion but ultimately allowing a glimmer of hope to break through.

The entire ensemble cast brings their characters skilfully and distinctly to life, but there are a few standouts. Chris Hemsworth is seductively charismatic and utterly horrid as the lurid cult leader Billy Lee. Jeff Bridges disappears into the heartbreaking vulnerability of Father Daniel Flynn, as he tries to reconcile his past amidst a deteriorating memory. However, it's the lesser known faces that really shine. Lewis Pullman's turn as Miles Miller is deceptively complex, elevating what could've been a minor supporting role to a compelling study of guilt and repentance. Cynthia Erivo, an established stage actor but relative newcomer to film, brings further depth as the struggling soul singer Darlene Sweet. Erivo's performance is very much the emotional heart of Bad Times, providing the audience with a genuine human being to identify with amidst the seedy morality and gory violence. Her astonishing singing is also frequently used to infuse the action with a surreal, transfixing musicality.

Bad Times at the El Royale is a fascinating journey. Drew Goddard's inventive script draws the audience through a plot thick with mystery, populated by a diversely talented cast and told by impeccable, vibrant filmmaking. It's wildly ambitious and widely successful, packed with imaginative and unexpected ideas that largely land as intended. Whilst its surface is flashy and brutal, its subtext is thoughtful and its characters are nuanced. Bad Times at the El Royale is unlike anything else I've seen all year; it's surprising, captivating and thought-provoking at every twist and turn.

8.4/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Molly's Game Review

Up until this point, Aaron Sorkin has exclusively been a writer. Responsible for creating iconic TV shows such as  The West Wing and The Newsroom , as well as recently penning the screenplays for  The Social Network and  Steve Jobs , Sorkin's dense, witty and rapid-fire style is successful with critics and audiences alike. However, Molly's Game marks Sorkin's first time in the director's chair. Unlike The Social Network and Steve Jobs , where Sorkin's writing was filtered through directors David Fincher and Danny Boyle respectively, this is purely his vision . Is it any good, or is it just an indulgent attempt to cram as many words into 140 minutes as possible? There is no doubt that Molly's Game is an Aaron Sorkin film. Dialogue is the centre of attention and for good reason: it's excellent. Of course, it isn't exactly naturalistic. Every line sounds like one that you come up with an hour after a conversation and wish you'd said instead. Howe...

Is Super 8 Any Good?

Super Gr8 Super 8 - A Late Film Review by Nathan Brooks Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of a train exploding. A little while back, Disney bought Star Wars off of George Lucas. Shortly afterwards, they announced they were going to make not one, not two, not three, not four, not fi- oh no wait, it is five. Five new Star Wars films, the first of which, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is being directed by J.J. Abrams. The real question, however, is whether Abrams will do a good job of it or not. Well, this is the film that makes me confident he will. Story On it's own the story isn't extremely amazing, it's just about a bunch of kids discovering a government conspiracy, although it is still interesting. It doesn't reveal too much, meaning you're kept in the dark throughout the majority of the film, so you're always wanting to find out what happens next. The thing is though, that's sort of a sub plot. The main part of the story is th...

Inside Out Review - Pixar Back on Form

In the middle of 2014, I remember thinking to myself that I didn't really care about Pixar anymore. Back then I just thought it was because I'd grown out of it. I was 12, I was older now, I could legally buy a Marvel film on DVD, I could get library books out without my parents knowing, I didn't need to watch these silly children's films. In hindsight, however, I see it differently. The problem wasn't me, it was Pixar. Just look at the last films they'd made; Monsters University (2013), Brave (2012) and Cars 2 (2011). None of these were awful films by any means, but they weren't really up to Pixar's usual standards. Then along came Inside Out and I realised that I was being ridiculous. I hadn't grown out of Pixar, there's no such thing. Whilst Minions  appealed mainly to younger audiences by being just plain silly, with silly jokes, silly stories and silly characters, Inside Out, just like Pixar's best work, appealed to everyone by being ...