Skip to main content

Doctor Who: Rosa Review


The thing everyone's going to talk about with Rosa is its politics. Doctor Who has always implied political messages, but it's never made them such an explicit and integral part of an episode. Fortunately, Rosa picks a political message we can all get behind (I hope). The Doctor and friends find themselves in 1955 Alabama, the day before Rosa Parks essentially kick-started the Civil Rights Movement. It's a difficult setting for such a diverse cast to be in and the episode doesn't shy away from that fact. Historical racism has been tackled before, particularly with Martha in the Human Nature/The Family of Blood story. However, it's never felt as horrific as it does here. Especially in contrast to the previous series, which attempted diverse representation without delving too deep into actual issues of prejudice, the horrors of racism are depicted with shocking efficacy. 

Naturally, the issue of racism drives this episode's character development. Yas and Ryan are the focus, as they find themselves victims of an explicit and unashamedly racist society. Even if you didn't care about these characters, the scenes when they're forced out of a diner or hiding from a racist cop are tense and difficult watches. Considering how much we've grown to care about them over the past two episodes, these moments are even more upsetting. There's also a particularly thoughtful moment of dialogue when Yas and Ryan connect these incidents to their experiences with the more insidious and implicit racism of today. It's easily the episode’s most challenging moment, provoking us to consider how far we've come and how far we've still got to go. Graham, as the grandfather of Ryan, is challenged as an ally. He finds himself with a particularly difficult dilemma at the end of the episode, when he feels like he's sacrificing his values for the greater good.

Amidst all of this, it could've been easy for the episode to forget to be Doctor Who. Fortunately, it doesn't. Rosa is Thirteen's first historical episode, a familiar concept for Doctor Who fans, but writers Malorie Blackman and Chris Chibnall have ensured it feels fresh. Blackman and Chibnall have taken us to a notably recent period of history, arguably making the episode feel more relevant, which the plot takes full advantage of. Rather than changing the past, the Doctor and friends are trying to keep it the same. The tension is heightened by the relative modernity of the setting, as we can more easily picture the impact it would have on our present. There's also the frequent humour that never undermines the harsh portrayals of racism, but provides an alternative attitude that proves how much better it is when we get along. Particularly lovely moments include a gag about the Doctor being Banksy and Ryan's reactions to interacting with Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr.

Unfortunately, I did notice a couple of missteps. Maybe because the rest of the episode is of such a high standard, the flaws stand out a bit more. I've been raving about Segun Akinola's score and for the most part, it's still solid. However, during Rosa Parks’ moments of defiance, there's an oddly on the nose choice of music. In particular, a disappointingly cheesy pop song means the already inspirational moment Parks refuses to give up her seat can't speak for itself. The antagonist, who appears to be some sort of time traveling Tommy Robinson, is also more of a plot device than a character. However, I do think that's sort of the point. The real villain isn't just one bloke doing naughty things, but the evil, bigoted racism that Rosa Parks stands up against. If anything, it's one of the scariest Doctor Who villains in a long time.

Sadly, even though its message should be a universal one, this episode is probably still going to be divisive. However, I think that only bolsters how successful and necessary it is. Rosa is an impressively daring episode that isn't afraid to tackle difficult, relevant issues whilst still maintaining everything we love about Doctor Who.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...