Skip to main content

Doctor Who: The Woman Who Fell to Earth Review


I approached this new series of Doctor Who with trepidation. For the most part, I was very excited. I was especially looking forward to Jodie Whittaker's Doctor. She'd proven herself to be a highly capable dramatic actor on screen and appeared to have exactly the right energy off screen to bring the iconic Time Lord to life. What concerned me, however, was the new showrunner. Despite receiving much acclaim for his crime drama Broadchurch, Chris Chibnall's contributions to Doctor Who have been mixed. The series seven episodes Dinosaurs on a Spaceship and The Power of Three were particular low points that Chibnall was responsible for. Still, I had hope. Maybe Chibnall would be far more adept in the position of showrunner. Plus, all the trailers and promotional material looked great. So, now the first episode has landed (or fallen, I guess) was I right to be cautious?

With a new showrunner in charge, things are inevitably going to feel different. However, I think this change is a more jarring one than when Steven Moffat took over from Russell T. Davies. There a number of reasons I think this is the case. Moffat, for one, was a more frequent contributor to Davies' era than Chibnall has been to either. Consequently, we were far more familiar with what Moffat's vision for the show would be than Chibnall's. Additionally, Moffat had been at the helm for seven years - three more than Davies - so his style had become more entrenched into the identity of Doctor Who. The main reason, however, is because Chibnall is simply a very different showrunner. Moffat's era was defined by his trademark complex, wibbly wobbly, timey wimey plots. Whilst initially popular, this became increasingly divisive as Moffat indulged in it more. I always quite enjoyed these storylines, but it's understandable why some would feel exhausted by them.

Chibnall has been very clear that he's going for the complete opposite. With ten standalone episodes in this series, avoiding any grand story arcs and attempting to be an entry point for new fans, his approach to story is deliberately more straightforward. This is very apparent in The Woman Who Fell to Earth. Chibnall maintains a level of mystery to keep the viewer intrigued by the plot, but he doesn't play with its structure in any way or attempt any bonkers time travel ideas. Quite simply, there's an alien on earth and the Doctor needs to find out what it wants and how to stop it. However, in the place of an elaborate plot is a very welcome focus on character. The first ten minutes could have convincingly been its own standalone drama, as Chibnall takes the time to introduce and flesh out the new TARDIS team before dropping the Doctor into the mix.

As fond as I am of Moffat's era, his characters didn't always click instantly. His focus was a very intellectual one that channelled most of its energy into coming up with intricate twists and ambitious concepts. Out of this, strong emotional moments were often born, but not always. Clara and her 'impossible girl’ arc in series seven is a perfect example of how Moffat could write a fascinating concept but neglect creating a relatable, well-rounded human being for audiences to connect to. Clara did improve with time, but it would've made Matt Smith's final series a lot less hit or miss if she'd been great from the start. Chibnall is clearly aware of this because I already feel like I empathise with these new characters as if we've spent way more than an hour with them.

By keeping the plot simple, Chibnall leaves space to explore who these new characters are. What motivates them, what frustrates them, who and what they care about and why we should care about them. There are numerous lovely scenes in which nothing's happening except characters talking to each other, expressing genuine emotion and carving out authentic identities. In later episodes, I would like to see the plots develop further. For the mysteries to become deeper and the aliens to become less straightforward, but for a first episode, this works. We need to care about these characters or else we'll be fundamentally disengaged from the series. The characters are further enhanced by the cast. Mandip Gill, Tosin Cole and Bradley Walsh define their characters diversely and convincingly. All three of them are also left with a lot of room to grow and I can't wait to witness that as the series unfolds.

However, the crucial question is: how good is Jodie Whittaker? Well, right now it's hard to say because it always is with a new Doctor. The first post-regeneration episode inevitably sees the character finding their feet, so we tend to only glimpse their true potential in the third act. That said, Whittaker handles this process spectacularly. She delivers every line with such spark and enthusiasm, echoing the wit and madness of past regenerations through her own unique energy. Whittaker's Doctor looks at the world with a delightful wonder and curiosity that was present ever since she reacted to her regeneration with a gleeful “brilliant!” Chibnall writes the Doctor in a state of rediscovery. We see her searching for her values in an effort to define herself, defiantly declaring (in the most Doctor-y of ways) “when people need help, I never refuse”. It's also undeniably exciting to refer to the Doctor as ‘she’.

The most welcome change for me, however, is how much the filmmaking has improved. Jamie Childs, the director of this and three other episodes this series, has said he drew inspiration from '80s Steven Spielberg films. As well as being a savvy commercial move (given the success of '80s nostalgia-fest Stranger Things) this is perfect for Whittaker's Doctor. The magic and whimsy of Spielberg's style compliments and emphasises those same qualities in Whittaker's performance. This is most apparent in the sonic screwdriver constructing montage, with its swirling camera work, vibrant lighting and rousing music. That music is also significant because, for the first time since the reboot, it’s not composed by Murray Gold. Segun Akinola has taken over and he’s already doing some fantastic work. This episode’s score ranges from the soaring orchestra uplifting the aforementioned montage to the ‘60s evoking electronic eeriness underpinning the creepier scenes.

So, everything’s new and nothing is certain. Things could get much better from here, things could get much worse, or they could stay just about the same. All I can say is I can’t wait for the next episode, which makes The Woman Who Fell to Earth successful in my book.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...