Skip to main content

Doctor Who: The Witchfinders Review


The Witchfinders is the second episode to be both written and directed by a woman in the history of Doctor Who. What’s even more shocking is that it’s the first episode with that combination since 1983. Now, in a perfect world, their genders wouldn't matter. We'd only be concerned about their ability to make a good episode of Doctor Who. However, if this combination is so rare, clearly more than just talent is at play. Series 11 has quite explicitly made it its mission to diversify both in front of and behind the camera. Inevitably, this means the series has more pressure to 'prove itself’ and demonstrate that white men aren't the only ones who can make good television. So far, arguably the two best episodes (Rosa and Demons of the Punjab) have had scripts penned by writers who don’t fit the ‘white male’ label. Obviously, their lack of white male-ness isn't the only reason they wrote good episodes, but their backgrounds certainly enriched their stories with a welcome fresh perspective. 

So, I anticipated The Witchfinders with nervous excitement. Beyond the gender of its writer/director team, a Doctor Who episode set during the 17th-century witch-hunts had a lot of potential. On top of that, casting Alan Cumming as James I was a stroke of genius. However, I was still naturally dreading the episode would squander all this potential. Kerblam!, for example, started off fantastic but faltered at the third act by muddling its message. Similarly, Arachnids in the UK was almost there but couldn't quite land the point it was trying to make. On top of this, The Witchfinders has to live up to the lofty reputation the historical episodes have garnered this series. The aforementioned Rosa and Demons of the Punjab are by far series 11’s most powerful episodes with their thoughtful and affecting explorations of important political issues. Can The Witchfinders be nearly as good?

Fortunately, I needn't have worried. Writer Joy Wilkinson's script is absolutely masterful. More than anybody else this series, Wilkinson perfectly balances the numerous elements that make up an episode of Doctor Who. The comedy, horror and drama are juggled so deftly that they simply become organically intertwined. The writing (alongside Pete McTighe's script for Kerblam!) is also some of the series’ funniest; Graham's quip about putting the witchfinders into special measures is a particular highlight. This series has also tried introducing exclusively new aliens with mixed results. Wilkinson finally nails it with the Morax, an imprisoned alien race that resurrect the dead as mud spewing zombies. The makeup and special effects are wonderfully freaky, instilling the most genuine sense of threat all series. Sallie Aprahamian's pertinent direction, Tim Palmer's expressive cinematography and Segun Akinola's typically stunning score further enhance the episode's array of moods and atmospheres.

The Witchfinders also features some of the series best character explorations. Like in Kerblam! Team TARDIS are slightly sidelined, but they're not entirely forgotten. There's a particularly lovely moment when Yaz opens up about her struggles with bullying and anxiety as a teenager. Television trying to relate to young people can often seem forced and embarrassing, but Wilkinson's script does it naturally and tastefully. However, the episode's focus clearly lies on its side characters. Willa Twiston, the granddaughter of one of the witch-hunt’s victims, is an empathetic character facing struggles as a young woman many can identify with, despite her 17th-century setting. Her relationship with Becka Savage is also fascinating, initially shrouded in mystery before gradually revealing its complexities as events force them to reconcile their difficult history.

Naturally, Alan Cumming’s performance as James I is one of the greatest things to ever grace our television screens. He spectacularly elaborates on what we know about James I’s personality with delightful, flirtatious flamboyance. From one of the trailers, I was partially concerned his role was going to be reduced to a one-note pantomime villain. Fortunately, that’s not at all the case. Whilst Cumming certainly brings an air of that to the role, he doesn’t let it completely take over the performance and Wilkinson’s script frequently challenges his character with surprising depth. James I had an extremely broken childhood and this depiction of him is significantly haunted by it, resulting in a crippling inability to trust anybody around him. I don’t know how historically accurate that is, but as a way of presenting the figure as a television character, it’s a successfully nuanced approach.

Speaking of nuance, The Witchfinders - like the previous historical episodes - touches on issues of political relevance with impressive attentiveness. There’s a natural feminist subtext that can be drawn out of the witch-hunts, which Wilkinson manages to skilfully embed into the action of the episode. Most notably, Jodie Whittaker’s Doctor has her first experience of sexism, remarking grimly that, "If I was still a bloke I could just get stuff done and not have to waste time defending myself". Becka Savage is also an inherently thought-provoking character, thanks to her complicated position as a woman with moderate influence in early modern England. However, the most intriguing theme Wilkinson brings out of the witch-hunts has to be the fear of the unknown. An especially intense dialogue between the Doctor and James I challenges the tendency to blame those who are different from us for our fears and insecurities. These themes don't provide the backbone to the script in the way the politics did for the previous historical episodes. Instead, they're more implicit but no less insightful.

So, have the women proven themselves to be as good at making Doctor Who as the men? Is it absurd that anyone would ever think they couldn't be as good at making Doctor Who as the men? The answer to both of those questions is a resounding yes. The Witchfinders is just an utterly brilliant episode of Doctor Who. It brings together everything that makes Doctor Who such a unique and beloved show and it does so with such undeniable skill and care. It also marks a decisive hat-trick for the historical episodes this series and, most importantly, made me very very happy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...