Skip to main content

Sorry to Bother You Review


Sorry to Bother You, the directorial debut of The Coup frontman Boots Riley, is part of a growing trend of Afro-surrealism in film and television. Donald Glover's brilliant Atlanta series has dabbled in surreal comedy and last year's Get Out saw Jordan Peele take advantage of the style's horror potential. Whilst this could be seen as an effort to escape reality, most of these artists have actually utilised surrealism as a means of better understanding it. Let's face it, it's futile trying to understand the current state of the world through logic and rationalism. Sorry to Bother You is easily the most absurd yet, blending both comedy and horror to evoke the unsettling mixture of hilarity and dread regularly brought on by a glance at the day's news. It's also a brutal and uncompromising evisceration of capitalism and its insidious ability to corrupt those rewarded by it.

Lakeith Stanfield's protagonist Cassius Green ('cash is green’) is presented as capitalism’s tragic hero. His heart's in the right place, but when the opportunity to earn money beyond his wildest dreams arises, the moral ambiguities do little to stop him from taking it. His character arc draws on a wider tension concerning how one navigates the capitalist system, making enough money to survive in it without being seduced by it. The most insightful aspect, however, is what finally snaps him out of his rise to power. Content with making money at the expense of others, Green only starts to question things when he has to make money at the expense of himself. He only realises (or accepts) he is being corrupted when the consequences of it threaten his own welfare. Green’s opportunistic actions are juxtaposed against his activist girlfriend and co-workers, who - having not been rewarded by the system - stay true to their principles.

Sorry to Bother You's primary use of surrealism comes in the form of the 'white voice’. It's an amusing and ingenious way of satirising the extra barriers of discrimination faced by African-Americans. Green and his black co-workers are unable to achieve success as telemarketers unless they deny their own identity and conform to the expectations of the white population. Once Green makes it into the upper echelons of the company, he is forced to constantly maintain his white voice, except for when the white CEOs want to exploit his blackness (or rather their stereotyped perception of it) for their own amusement. However, it's not until the third act that the surrealism reaches its peak, as Green uncovers the grotesque manifestations of capitalist greed and oppression. The whole atmosphere of this section, in fact, is claustrophobic and uncomfortable; Green’s upper-class life isolates him from the rest of society and traps him in an environment of horrific absurdity.

All of this works because, despite Sorry to Bother You being his first film, Riley constructs it so well. Every single detail is vital; what may seem like a minor background gag turns out to be essential to the narrative. Riley also composes every scene with striking inventiveness, most notably when Green and his desk crash into the rooms of the people he’s cold-calling. It’s a brilliant idea that perfectly conveys both Green’s initial discomfort and later success, as the awkwardness and rapport are equally emphasised by his physical proximity to the person on the other side of the phone. The film is driven by a constant, vibrant energy created through its use of colour and an eclectic, genre-blending soundtrack provided by The Coup and art-pop project tUnE-yArDs. Sorry to Bother You’s ambitious narrative risks appearing scattershot and directionless, but fortunately Riley’s surprisingly assured filmmaking brings it all together.

The most fascinating thing about Sorry to Bother You is how its exploration of functioning within capitalism serves almost as a meta-commentary on the film itself. Riley is a communist and those beliefs are an integral part of the film’s messages, but in order for anyone to hear those messages, Riley must, to some extent, comply with the capitalist system. Like Green, Riley’s film has to be able to survive within capitalism without becoming a part of it. Sorry to Bother You does this, ultimately, by being completely, unashamedly bonkers. Riley doesn’t sacrifice any of the film’s bizarre aesthetic or rebellious message in order to reach a wider audience. Instead, despite having to rely on capitalism for its distribution, Sorry to Bother You is a ruthlessly comprehensive condemnation of the system and the most provocative, outlandish and extraordinary film of the year.

9.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Molly's Game Review

Up until this point, Aaron Sorkin has exclusively been a writer. Responsible for creating iconic TV shows such as  The West Wing and The Newsroom , as well as recently penning the screenplays for  The Social Network and  Steve Jobs , Sorkin's dense, witty and rapid-fire style is successful with critics and audiences alike. However, Molly's Game marks Sorkin's first time in the director's chair. Unlike The Social Network and Steve Jobs , where Sorkin's writing was filtered through directors David Fincher and Danny Boyle respectively, this is purely his vision . Is it any good, or is it just an indulgent attempt to cram as many words into 140 minutes as possible? There is no doubt that Molly's Game is an Aaron Sorkin film. Dialogue is the centre of attention and for good reason: it's excellent. Of course, it isn't exactly naturalistic. Every line sounds like one that you come up with an hour after a conversation and wish you'd said instead. Howe...

Is Super 8 Any Good?

Super Gr8 Super 8 - A Late Film Review by Nathan Brooks Sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of a train exploding. A little while back, Disney bought Star Wars off of George Lucas. Shortly afterwards, they announced they were going to make not one, not two, not three, not four, not fi- oh no wait, it is five. Five new Star Wars films, the first of which, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is being directed by J.J. Abrams. The real question, however, is whether Abrams will do a good job of it or not. Well, this is the film that makes me confident he will. Story On it's own the story isn't extremely amazing, it's just about a bunch of kids discovering a government conspiracy, although it is still interesting. It doesn't reveal too much, meaning you're kept in the dark throughout the majority of the film, so you're always wanting to find out what happens next. The thing is though, that's sort of a sub plot. The main part of the story is th...

Inside Out Review - Pixar Back on Form

In the middle of 2014, I remember thinking to myself that I didn't really care about Pixar anymore. Back then I just thought it was because I'd grown out of it. I was 12, I was older now, I could legally buy a Marvel film on DVD, I could get library books out without my parents knowing, I didn't need to watch these silly children's films. In hindsight, however, I see it differently. The problem wasn't me, it was Pixar. Just look at the last films they'd made; Monsters University (2013), Brave (2012) and Cars 2 (2011). None of these were awful films by any means, but they weren't really up to Pixar's usual standards. Then along came Inside Out and I realised that I was being ridiculous. I hadn't grown out of Pixar, there's no such thing. Whilst Minions  appealed mainly to younger audiences by being just plain silly, with silly jokes, silly stories and silly characters, Inside Out, just like Pixar's best work, appealed to everyone by being ...