Skip to main content

Sorry to Bother You Review


Sorry to Bother You, the directorial debut of The Coup frontman Boots Riley, is part of a growing trend of Afro-surrealism in film and television. Donald Glover's brilliant Atlanta series has dabbled in surreal comedy and last year's Get Out saw Jordan Peele take advantage of the style's horror potential. Whilst this could be seen as an effort to escape reality, most of these artists have actually utilised surrealism as a means of better understanding it. Let's face it, it's futile trying to understand the current state of the world through logic and rationalism. Sorry to Bother You is easily the most absurd yet, blending both comedy and horror to evoke the unsettling mixture of hilarity and dread regularly brought on by a glance at the day's news. It's also a brutal and uncompromising evisceration of capitalism and its insidious ability to corrupt those rewarded by it.

Lakeith Stanfield's protagonist Cassius Green ('cash is green’) is presented as capitalism’s tragic hero. His heart's in the right place, but when the opportunity to earn money beyond his wildest dreams arises, the moral ambiguities do little to stop him from taking it. His character arc draws on a wider tension concerning how one navigates the capitalist system, making enough money to survive in it without being seduced by it. The most insightful aspect, however, is what finally snaps him out of his rise to power. Content with making money at the expense of others, Green only starts to question things when he has to make money at the expense of himself. He only realises (or accepts) he is being corrupted when the consequences of it threaten his own welfare. Green’s opportunistic actions are juxtaposed against his activist girlfriend and co-workers, who - having not been rewarded by the system - stay true to their principles.

Sorry to Bother You's primary use of surrealism comes in the form of the 'white voice’. It's an amusing and ingenious way of satirising the extra barriers of discrimination faced by African-Americans. Green and his black co-workers are unable to achieve success as telemarketers unless they deny their own identity and conform to the expectations of the white population. Once Green makes it into the upper echelons of the company, he is forced to constantly maintain his white voice, except for when the white CEOs want to exploit his blackness (or rather their stereotyped perception of it) for their own amusement. However, it's not until the third act that the surrealism reaches its peak, as Green uncovers the grotesque manifestations of capitalist greed and oppression. The whole atmosphere of this section, in fact, is claustrophobic and uncomfortable; Green’s upper-class life isolates him from the rest of society and traps him in an environment of horrific absurdity.

All of this works because, despite Sorry to Bother You being his first film, Riley constructs it so well. Every single detail is vital; what may seem like a minor background gag turns out to be essential to the narrative. Riley also composes every scene with striking inventiveness, most notably when Green and his desk crash into the rooms of the people he’s cold-calling. It’s a brilliant idea that perfectly conveys both Green’s initial discomfort and later success, as the awkwardness and rapport are equally emphasised by his physical proximity to the person on the other side of the phone. The film is driven by a constant, vibrant energy created through its use of colour and an eclectic, genre-blending soundtrack provided by The Coup and art-pop project tUnE-yArDs. Sorry to Bother You’s ambitious narrative risks appearing scattershot and directionless, but fortunately Riley’s surprisingly assured filmmaking brings it all together.

The most fascinating thing about Sorry to Bother You is how its exploration of functioning within capitalism serves almost as a meta-commentary on the film itself. Riley is a communist and those beliefs are an integral part of the film’s messages, but in order for anyone to hear those messages, Riley must, to some extent, comply with the capitalist system. Like Green, Riley’s film has to be able to survive within capitalism without becoming a part of it. Sorry to Bother You does this, ultimately, by being completely, unashamedly bonkers. Riley doesn’t sacrifice any of the film’s bizarre aesthetic or rebellious message in order to reach a wider audience. Instead, despite having to rely on capitalism for its distribution, Sorry to Bother You is a ruthlessly comprehensive condemnation of the system and the most provocative, outlandish and extraordinary film of the year.

9.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hail, Caesar! Review - Genius Behind the Madness

On an entirely surface level, Hail, Caesar! is a really silly film. The sets are bright and colourful, the characters are bombastic and larger than life and the plot is completely insane and all over the place. If you take a closer look, however, it's much more intelligent than it initially comes off as. Yes, the sets are bright, but their attention to detail is so fantastically minute, you're totally convinced that this is the 50's. The fake film sets are also just as convincing and the films themselves could easily pass off as authentic, if it wasn't for the 21st Century actors populating them. They are obviously slightly exaggerated, for the sake of satire, which probably resonates more with those familiar with retro cinema than regular filmgoers. It's also shot brilliantly by cinematographer Roger Deakins (who was recently Oscar nominated for his work on Sicario ), who manages to make the film feel like something that's not only set in the 50's, bu...

Is Avengers: Age of Ultron Any Good?

Avengers Assemble! Again! Avengers: Age of Ultron - Film Review by Nathan Brooks And they say English Weather's bad. Back in the summer of 2012, a little film came out called Avengers Assemble. It wasn't much. It's only the biggest superhero film of all time and it only made $1.518 billion. Everybody loved it, I loved it and clearly moviegoers did as well.  Due to its massive success, obviously a sequel was going to be made. In this case, that sequel is Avengers: Age of Ultron, but with all the hype it's received, is it actually any good? Story The story in this film is definitely not for first time Marvel viewers, you really need to see most, if not all, of the previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films. It is packed full of references to earlier films and understanding a lot of elements of the story will require you to have seen the others. But is the story any good? I thinks so. The main story centres around the fact that Tony Stark, or Iron Man, has ...

The Complicated Entitlement of Arthur Fleck

Joker’s (Probably) Accidental Identity Politics The discourse around Joker , the Joaquin Phoenix-starring origin story of the infamous Batman villain, has been exhausting. Beginning before most people had even seen the film, battle lines were immediately drawn between those decrying its allegedly alt-right sympathies and edgy gamers convinced this was going to be the greatest film of all time. Now that it’s actually in cinemas and I’ve seen it, it’s a lot more complicated than that, even if it isn’t on purpose. To get it out of the way, Joker is a fantastically constructed film. Whilst it’s certainly derivative of other prestige pictures (Martin Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and King of Comedy have been regularly brought up) that doesn’t stop it from being spectacular and gripping in its own right. At the centre of it all is Phoenix, who’s performance is genuinely astonishing. The gruesome physicality he brings to the role is mesmerising, exemplified during the surreal dance sequences i...