Skip to main content

Sorry to Bother You Review


Sorry to Bother You, the directorial debut of The Coup frontman Boots Riley, is part of a growing trend of Afro-surrealism in film and television. Donald Glover's brilliant Atlanta series has dabbled in surreal comedy and last year's Get Out saw Jordan Peele take advantage of the style's horror potential. Whilst this could be seen as an effort to escape reality, most of these artists have actually utilised surrealism as a means of better understanding it. Let's face it, it's futile trying to understand the current state of the world through logic and rationalism. Sorry to Bother You is easily the most absurd yet, blending both comedy and horror to evoke the unsettling mixture of hilarity and dread regularly brought on by a glance at the day's news. It's also a brutal and uncompromising evisceration of capitalism and its insidious ability to corrupt those rewarded by it.

Lakeith Stanfield's protagonist Cassius Green ('cash is green’) is presented as capitalism’s tragic hero. His heart's in the right place, but when the opportunity to earn money beyond his wildest dreams arises, the moral ambiguities do little to stop him from taking it. His character arc draws on a wider tension concerning how one navigates the capitalist system, making enough money to survive in it without being seduced by it. The most insightful aspect, however, is what finally snaps him out of his rise to power. Content with making money at the expense of others, Green only starts to question things when he has to make money at the expense of himself. He only realises (or accepts) he is being corrupted when the consequences of it threaten his own welfare. Green’s opportunistic actions are juxtaposed against his activist girlfriend and co-workers, who - having not been rewarded by the system - stay true to their principles.

Sorry to Bother You's primary use of surrealism comes in the form of the 'white voice’. It's an amusing and ingenious way of satirising the extra barriers of discrimination faced by African-Americans. Green and his black co-workers are unable to achieve success as telemarketers unless they deny their own identity and conform to the expectations of the white population. Once Green makes it into the upper echelons of the company, he is forced to constantly maintain his white voice, except for when the white CEOs want to exploit his blackness (or rather their stereotyped perception of it) for their own amusement. However, it's not until the third act that the surrealism reaches its peak, as Green uncovers the grotesque manifestations of capitalist greed and oppression. The whole atmosphere of this section, in fact, is claustrophobic and uncomfortable; Green’s upper-class life isolates him from the rest of society and traps him in an environment of horrific absurdity.

All of this works because, despite Sorry to Bother You being his first film, Riley constructs it so well. Every single detail is vital; what may seem like a minor background gag turns out to be essential to the narrative. Riley also composes every scene with striking inventiveness, most notably when Green and his desk crash into the rooms of the people he’s cold-calling. It’s a brilliant idea that perfectly conveys both Green’s initial discomfort and later success, as the awkwardness and rapport are equally emphasised by his physical proximity to the person on the other side of the phone. The film is driven by a constant, vibrant energy created through its use of colour and an eclectic, genre-blending soundtrack provided by The Coup and art-pop project tUnE-yArDs. Sorry to Bother You’s ambitious narrative risks appearing scattershot and directionless, but fortunately Riley’s surprisingly assured filmmaking brings it all together.

The most fascinating thing about Sorry to Bother You is how its exploration of functioning within capitalism serves almost as a meta-commentary on the film itself. Riley is a communist and those beliefs are an integral part of the film’s messages, but in order for anyone to hear those messages, Riley must, to some extent, comply with the capitalist system. Like Green, Riley’s film has to be able to survive within capitalism without becoming a part of it. Sorry to Bother You does this, ultimately, by being completely, unashamedly bonkers. Riley doesn’t sacrifice any of the film’s bizarre aesthetic or rebellious message in order to reach a wider audience. Instead, despite having to rely on capitalism for its distribution, Sorry to Bother You is a ruthlessly comprehensive condemnation of the system and the most provocative, outlandish and extraordinary film of the year.

9.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

Jurassic Park never needed to be a franchise. As a thriller, Jurassic Park inherently works better the more compact it is, so stretching it into multiple sequels seems rather counterproductive. Of course, I wouldn't mind if these sequels were good. Unfortunately, they are not. The Lost World , the first follow-up, does nothing new for virtually the entire film - only hinting at a distinctive identity in the final act. Jurassic Park 3 was even worse. The characters are so unengaging and the action so toothless you end it feeling like you've stared at an empty void for ninety minutes. Colin Trevorrow's 2015 sequel/reboot Jurassic World slightly reinvigorated the franchise with flashy new visuals, but it also suffered from bland characters and a muddled script. However, against all the odds, I still foolishly had my hopes up for that film’s follow-up Fallen Kingdom . I did have my reasons, to be fair. J.A. Bayona was taking over directorial duties and he's an exce...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Review - A Dazzling Celebration of All Things Star Wars

The Force Awakens was supposed to be bad. It's the seventh film in a franchise, following on from three films that were not well received and is (technically) a Disney sequel. I have now gone to see it four times. Technical Brilliance As far as fundamental filmmaking is concerned, The Force Awakens surpasses any of the previous Star Wars films. It's by far the best written Star Wars film, not that the bar was set particularly high. Still, it's a surprisingly witty film. Aside from the odd line of obligatory exposition, dialogue is very snappy, fast paced and unexpectedly funny. I've probably laughed more in this film than I have in many so-called comedies. While it's not exactly Aaron Sorkin level, J.J. Abrams’ fantastic directing and the actors brilliant delivery, as well as the tight, fast paced editing do help to elevate it. Speaking of the editing, The Force Awakens is also much better paced than any of the other Star Wars films. It's constantly ...