Skip to main content

Sorry to Bother You Review


Sorry to Bother You, the directorial debut of The Coup frontman Boots Riley, is part of a growing trend of Afro-surrealism in film and television. Donald Glover's brilliant Atlanta series has dabbled in surreal comedy and last year's Get Out saw Jordan Peele take advantage of the style's horror potential. Whilst this could be seen as an effort to escape reality, most of these artists have actually utilised surrealism as a means of better understanding it. Let's face it, it's futile trying to understand the current state of the world through logic and rationalism. Sorry to Bother You is easily the most absurd yet, blending both comedy and horror to evoke the unsettling mixture of hilarity and dread regularly brought on by a glance at the day's news. It's also a brutal and uncompromising evisceration of capitalism and its insidious ability to corrupt those rewarded by it.

Lakeith Stanfield's protagonist Cassius Green ('cash is green’) is presented as capitalism’s tragic hero. His heart's in the right place, but when the opportunity to earn money beyond his wildest dreams arises, the moral ambiguities do little to stop him from taking it. His character arc draws on a wider tension concerning how one navigates the capitalist system, making enough money to survive in it without being seduced by it. The most insightful aspect, however, is what finally snaps him out of his rise to power. Content with making money at the expense of others, Green only starts to question things when he has to make money at the expense of himself. He only realises (or accepts) he is being corrupted when the consequences of it threaten his own welfare. Green’s opportunistic actions are juxtaposed against his activist girlfriend and co-workers, who - having not been rewarded by the system - stay true to their principles.

Sorry to Bother You's primary use of surrealism comes in the form of the 'white voice’. It's an amusing and ingenious way of satirising the extra barriers of discrimination faced by African-Americans. Green and his black co-workers are unable to achieve success as telemarketers unless they deny their own identity and conform to the expectations of the white population. Once Green makes it into the upper echelons of the company, he is forced to constantly maintain his white voice, except for when the white CEOs want to exploit his blackness (or rather their stereotyped perception of it) for their own amusement. However, it's not until the third act that the surrealism reaches its peak, as Green uncovers the grotesque manifestations of capitalist greed and oppression. The whole atmosphere of this section, in fact, is claustrophobic and uncomfortable; Green’s upper-class life isolates him from the rest of society and traps him in an environment of horrific absurdity.

All of this works because, despite Sorry to Bother You being his first film, Riley constructs it so well. Every single detail is vital; what may seem like a minor background gag turns out to be essential to the narrative. Riley also composes every scene with striking inventiveness, most notably when Green and his desk crash into the rooms of the people he’s cold-calling. It’s a brilliant idea that perfectly conveys both Green’s initial discomfort and later success, as the awkwardness and rapport are equally emphasised by his physical proximity to the person on the other side of the phone. The film is driven by a constant, vibrant energy created through its use of colour and an eclectic, genre-blending soundtrack provided by The Coup and art-pop project tUnE-yArDs. Sorry to Bother You’s ambitious narrative risks appearing scattershot and directionless, but fortunately Riley’s surprisingly assured filmmaking brings it all together.

The most fascinating thing about Sorry to Bother You is how its exploration of functioning within capitalism serves almost as a meta-commentary on the film itself. Riley is a communist and those beliefs are an integral part of the film’s messages, but in order for anyone to hear those messages, Riley must, to some extent, comply with the capitalist system. Like Green, Riley’s film has to be able to survive within capitalism without becoming a part of it. Sorry to Bother You does this, ultimately, by being completely, unashamedly bonkers. Riley doesn’t sacrifice any of the film’s bizarre aesthetic or rebellious message in order to reach a wider audience. Instead, despite having to rely on capitalism for its distribution, Sorry to Bother You is a ruthlessly comprehensive condemnation of the system and the most provocative, outlandish and extraordinary film of the year.

9.2/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Horrible Christmas Rant

Horrible, Horrible Christmas, In Every Single Sense of the Word Horrible Christmas - A Quick Rant by Nathan Brooks The Good When you expect one thing, and get something else, you can get very angry. You can get so angry that you refuse to acknowledge the positives of what you have got, and just focus on what you haven't got. For example, Agents of SHIELD. I think Agents of SHIELD is great, but unfortunately I don't appear to share that opinion with a lot of other people. Why? Because they're too busy whining about the lack of all the superhero-y stuff they expected and fair enough, considering you are watching a Marvel TV show. However, I've managed to let that initial disappointment go, and I've found I really enjoy this show.  The Bad Horrible Christmas, a Horrible Histories stage production, is the complete opposite of this. As the theme of this post suggests, I expected something great. Horrible Histories is the only children's educatio...

Is Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! Any Good?

Dude, Where's My Funny?! Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey?! - Film Review by Nathan Brooks Nativity's lack of critical success completely baffles me. I thought Nativity was a great movie. It was funny, it had more depth to it than most comedies and was overall just a fun movie. Nativity 2: Danger in the Manger's lack of critical success, I understand a lot better. I still remember it being fairly entertaining, but I was about 11 then, and I didn't have a brilliant judgement of what makes a good movie. Of what I can remember, however, it was nowhere near as good as Nativity in terms of story and character and basically everything important needed to make a good film. I also remember that they spent most of the movie in a bus. Nativity 3: Dude, Where's My Donkey is proof that the film makers have given up on trying to please the critics. This is an awful film. Nativity 2 was not a brilliant movie, but it at least kept me entertained for however long it...

Is Avengers: Age of Ultron Any Good?

Avengers Assemble! Again! Avengers: Age of Ultron - Film Review by Nathan Brooks And they say English Weather's bad. Back in the summer of 2012, a little film came out called Avengers Assemble. It wasn't much. It's only the biggest superhero film of all time and it only made $1.518 billion. Everybody loved it, I loved it and clearly moviegoers did as well.  Due to its massive success, obviously a sequel was going to be made. In this case, that sequel is Avengers: Age of Ultron, but with all the hype it's received, is it actually any good? Story The story in this film is definitely not for first time Marvel viewers, you really need to see most, if not all, of the previous Marvel Cinematic Universe films. It is packed full of references to earlier films and understanding a lot of elements of the story will require you to have seen the others. But is the story any good? I thinks so. The main story centres around the fact that Tony Stark, or Iron Man, has ...